Honduras 2009 6/29

A Few Thoughts on the Coup in Honduras – Jeremy Scahill Junne 29, 2009 “Rebel Reports” –

There is a lot of great analysis circulating on the military coup against Manuel Zelaya in Honduras.
I do not see a need to re-invent the wheel. (See here here here and here). However, a few key things
jump out at me. First, we know that the coup was led by Gen. Romeo Vasquez, a graduate of the
US Army School of the Americas. As we know very well from history, these “graduates” maintain ties to
the US military as they climb the military career ladders in their respective countries.
That is a major reason why the US trains these individuals.

Secondly, the US has a fairly significant military presence in Honduras.
Joint Task Force-Bravo is located at Soto Cano Air Base, Honduras.
The base is home to some 550 US military personnel and more than 650 US and Honduran civilians:

They work in six different areas including the Joint Staff, Air Force Forces (612th Air Base Squadron),
Army Forces, Joint Security Forces and the Medical Element. 1st Battalion, 228th Aviation Regiment,
a US Army South asset, is a tenant unit also based at Soto Cano.
The J-Staff provides command and control for JTF-B.
The New York Times reports that “The unit focuses on training Honduran military forces, counternarcotics
operations, search and rescue, and disaster relief missions throughout Central America.”

Significantly, according to GlobalSecurity, “Soto Cano is a Honduran military installation and home of the Honduran Air Force.”


 

This connection to the Air Force is particularly significant given this report in NarcoNews:

The head of the Air Force, Gen. Luis Javier Prince Suazo, studied in the School of the Americas in 1996.
The Air Force has been a central protagonist in the Honduran crisis.
When the military refused to distribute the ballot boxes for the opinion poll, the ballot boxes were stored
on an Air Force base until citizens accompanied by Zelaya rescued them.
Zelaya reports that after soldiers kidnapped him, they took him to an Air Force base,
where he was put on a plane and sent to Costa Rica.
It is impossible to imagine that the US was not aware that the coup was in the works.
In fact, this was basically confirmed by The New York Times in Monday’s paper:

As the crisis escalated, American officials began in the last few days to talk with Honduran government
and military officials in an effort to head off a possible coup. A senior administration official,
who briefed reporters on the condition of anonymity, said the military broke off those discussions on Sunday.
While the US has issued heavily-qualified statements critical of the coup
—in the aftermath of the events in Honduras—the US could have flexed its tremendous economic muscle
before the coup and told the military coup plotters to stand down.
The US ties to the Honduran military and political establishment run far too deep for all of this to have gone
down without at least tacit support or the turning of a blind eye by some US political or military official(s).

Here are some facts to consider: the US is the top trading partner for Honduras.
The coup plotters/supporters in the Honduran Congress are supporters of the “free trade agreements”
Washington has imposed on the region.
The coup leaders view their actions, in part, as a rejection of Hugo Chavez’s influence in Honduras and with
Zelaya and an embrace of the United States and Washington’s “vision” for the region. Obama and the
US military could likely have halted this coup with a simple series of phone calls.
For an interesting take on all of this, make sure to check out Nikolas Kozloff’s piece on Counterpunch, where he writes:

In November, Zelaya hailed Obama’s election in the U.S. as “a hope for the world,” but just two months
later tensions began to emerge.  In an audacious letter sent personally to Obama, Zelaya accused the
U.S. of “interventionism” and called on the new administration in Washington to respect the principle
of non-interference in the political affairs of other nations.
Here are some independent news sources on this story:
School of the Americas Watch
NarcoNews
Eva Golinger’s Postcards from the Revolution

© 2009 Jeremy Scahill
Comments (41)

http://informationclearinghouse.info/article22944.htm

At least two leaders of the coup launched in Honduras today were apparently trained
at a controversial Department of Defense school based at Fort Benning, Georgia
infamous for producing graduates linked to torture,
death squads and other human rights abuses.
http://www.southernstudies.org/2009/06/key-leaders-of-honduras-military-coup-trained-in-us.html

Military Coup in Honduras  www.SOAW.org

From CISPES: Here are statements by other members of the Organization of American States:

(http://americasmexico.blogspot.com/2009/06/oas-countries-back-zelaya-calls-for.html).

Honduras Coup not News???
http://www.opednews.com/populum/diarypage.php?did=13629

New Honduran leader sworn in
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8123513.stm

Honduras names new leader after president ousted in military coup
http://news.scotsman.com/latestnews/Honduras-names-new-leader-after.5408957.jp

Honduran president overthrown, new leader voted in
http://news.theage.com.au/breaking-news-world/honduran-president-overthrown-new-leader-voted-in-20090629-d1fb.html

Honduras Supreme Court says it ordered presidents’ ouster
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2009-06/29/content_11616407.htm

Exiled Zelaya insists he is rightful Honduran president

http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-world/exiled-zelaya-insists-he-is-rightful-honduran-president-20090629-d1en.html

Protests erupt after coup in Honduras
http://tvnz.co.nz/world-news/protests-erupt-after-coup-in-honduras-2810235

Honduran President Is Ousted in Coup
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/29/world/americas/29honduras.html

Honduras Zelaya calls for peaceful resistance to coup
http://theusdaily.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=786669&type=home

Costa Rica calls on int’l community to condemn Honduras coup
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2009-06/29/content_11616377.htm

Ecuador says not to recognize any new Honduras govt
http://www.forexyard.com/en/reuters_inner.tpl?action=2009-06-28T173730Z_01_N28339621_RTRIDST_0_HONDURAS-PRESIDENT-ECUADOR-URGENT

US seeks return to power of deposed Honduran leader, and safety of his family meantime
http://www.canadaeast.com/news/article/712696

Ecuador, Venezuela condemn Honduras coup
http://english.cctv.com/20090629/101301.shtml

President.Zelaya.in.Costa.Rica
http://www.publicbroadcasting.net/wbfo/news.newsmain/article/0/0/1523223/World/Honduras.President.Zelaya.in.Costa.Rica.report (Reuters)

June 28th:

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/6/28/747720/-%5BUpdate-14%5D-Military-Coup-Underway-Now-in-Honduras

Postcards from the Revolution http://www.chavezcode.com/ 

UN General Assembly To Meet On Honduras Unrest Monday-Spokesman
http://www.nasdaq.com/aspx/stock-market-news-story.aspx?storyid=200906281959dowjonesdjonline000374&title=un-general-assembly-to-meet-on-honduras-unrest-monday-spokesman

Cuba condemns Honduras coup as ‘criminal, brutal’
http://www.reuters.com/article/latestCrisis/idUSN28348369

Coup in Honduras?
Soldiers arrested leftist President Manuel Zelaya Sunday as he planned

to carry out a controversial referendum to extend presidential term limits,

despite a Supreme Court ruling that the vote would be illegal.
http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/0628/p06s07-woam.html

Should Honduras constitution be changed?
http://newsforums.bbc.co.uk/nol/thread.jspa?forumID=6660&edition=2&ttl=20090629021348

Lalin scores to help Honduras beat Panama 2-0
http://www.waaytv.com/Global/story.asp?S=10608899&nav=menu635_3

Troops oust Honduran president in feared coup
http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-world/troops-oust-honduran-president-in-feared-coup-20090628-d1cf.html

Honduras court says ordered army to oust Zelaya
http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/6/29/worldupdates/2009-06-28T230315Z_01_NOOTR_RTRMDNC_0_-406531-1&sec=Worldupdates

Honduran Leader Pushes Ahead With Divisive Vote
http://abcnews.go.com/International/WireStory?id=7948541&page=1

Zelaya vows to go ahead with controversial Honduras vote
http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-world/zelaya-vows-to-go-ahead-with-controversial-honduras-vote-20090628-d137.html

Honduran President Zelaya Ousted in Coup by Military (Update2)
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601086&sid=aRbH.AbdAgUA

Background on Military Coup in Honduras
http://www.dollarsandsense.org/blog/2009/06/background-on-military-coup-in-honduras.html

In pictures: Honduran president ousted
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_pictures/8123314.stm

Honduran military to pick interim president (Vid)
http://english.aljazeera.net/news/americas/2009/06/2009628141859453757.html

European Union condemns military coup in Honduras
http://www.gmanews.tv/story/166142/European-Union-condemns-military-coup-in-Honduras

Argentine President says military coup in Honduras is “a return to barbarism”
http://www.telam.com.ar/vernota.php?tipo=N&dis=1&sec=1&idPub=151669&id=299617&idnota=299617

ALBA representatives reaffirm support to Hondura`s Legitimate Government
http://mathaba.net/news/?x=620928
(the Bolivarian Alliance of the Peoples of Our America)

Obama concerned over expulsion of Honduran leader
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3738299,00.html

Clinton urges condemnation of Honduran action
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/28/AR2009062801032.html

Obama Calls for Order as Honduran Military Arrests President
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/06/28/obama-calls-order-military-arrests-honduran-president/

Arrest a coup, says Honduras leader
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/feedarticle/8581486

Honduran president calls arrest a ‘kidnapping’
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/28/AR2009062800792.html

Honduras President Zelaya in Costa Rica: report
http://www.publicbroadcasting.net/wamc/news.newsmain/article/0/0/1523223/World.News/Honduras.President.Zelaya.in.Costa.Rica.report

Honduran president forced to Costa Rica after coup (2nd Roundup)
http://www.monstersandcritics.com/news/americas/news/article_1486431.php/Honduran_president_forced_to_Costa_Rica_after_coup__2nd_Roundup__#ixzz0JkgrrKbf&D

Honduras: Military Coup a Blow to Democracy
http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/HRW/56d116d630d9216a9892fd8f2af18c35.htm

Honduras Zelaya calls for peaceful resistance to coup
http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/6/29/worldupdates/2009-06-28T215351Z_01_NOOTR_RTRMDNC_0_-406521-1&sec=Worldupdates

Honduras President Zelaya in Costa Rica – CNN
http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/6/28/worldupdates/2009-06-28T210221Z_01_NOOTR_RTRMDNC_0_-406513-1&sec=Worldupdates 

Court says Honduras to hold presidential vote in Nov. 29
http://www.worldbulletin.net/news_detail.php?id=44063

Venezuela Threatens Attack On Honduras
http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/World-News/Honduras-President-Manuel-Zelaya-Deposed-In-Coup-Venezuela-Threatens-Military-Attack/Article/200906415321924

Chavez: CIA Behind Coup in Honduras
http://www.lademajagua.co.cu/infgran11257.htm

UPDATE 2-Chavez threatens military action over Honduras coup
http://www.forexpros.com/news/commodities—futures-news/update-2-chavez-threatens-military-action-over-honduras-coup-66974

Venezuelan, Cuban, and Nicaraguan Ambassadors to Honduras Kidnapped
http://www.venezuelanalysis.com/news/4556

Venezuela says troops kidnap diplomats in Honduras
http://www.forexyard.com/en/reuters_inner.tpl?action=2009-06-28T165015Z_01_N28335731_RTRIDST_0_HONDURAS-PRESIDENT-AMBASSADORS-URGENT

Chavez puts Venezuela troops on alert on Honduras
http://in.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idINIndia-40653020090628

Israelis in Honduras warned to exercise caution amid unrest
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1096197.html

Is Honduras’ Military Junta The Hot New Revolution?
http://gawker.com/5303388/is-honduras-military-junta-the-hot-new-revolution

Honduras Tense After Army Coup – Wall Street Journal
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124619401378065339.html#mod=rss_Today%27s_Most_Popular

Honduras: Political Crisis Over Controversial Referendum
http://www.petroleumworld.com/sunopf09062801.htm

27th:

Zelaya continues push for controversial Honduras vote
http://news.theage.com.au/breaking-news-world/zelaya-continues-push-for-controversial-honduras-vote-20090627-d0fl.html

Chavez’s Hollow Pledge on Honduras
http://bellum.stanfordreview.org/?p=1413

26th:

Honduran President staves off coup attempt
http://www.fsrn.org/audio/headlines-friday-june-26-2009/4959

Much has been going on in Honduras this month leading up to this,
from a recent coup attempt (ablove), to an Earthquake, an OAS meeting,
and two important futball games.

7th
Win Over Honduras Keeps U.S. on Track – USA 2, Honduras 1
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/06/AR2009060602623.html?hpid=sec-sports

10th
Honduras edges El Salvador 1-0 in WCup qualifying
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/soccer/2009-06-10-2132962017_x.htm

2nd
Earthquake shakes Honduras before OAS meeting
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iwUoPU-nOb8Et42KKOKYUa8A43DwD98ILHVO1
http://www.fsrn.org/audio/headlines-friday-june-26-2009/4959

FACTBOX – Key facts about Honduras

http://www.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUSTRE55R17J20090628

Bill Maher on Obama, “Republican lite”

“Shouldn’t there be one party that unambiguously supports cutting the military
budget, a party that is straight up in favor of gun control, gay marriage, higher taxes
on the rich, universal health care – legalizing pot – and steep, direct taxing of
polluters? These aren’t radical ideas. A majority of Americans are either already for
them or would be if they were properly argued and defended.”
“Hey, Bill, we’re over here! What you described is the GREEN PARTY! We already exist!”
An Open Letter to Bill Maher from the Green Party
http://www.gp.org/press/pr-national.php?ID=231

“Maybe you forgot about us because the major media have an aversion to mentioning

the Green Party and our candidates. Maybe the FCC has banned “Green Party” along
with the late George Carlin’s seven dirty words, “Chomsky,” “End the Drug War,”
and other language that offends delicate sensibilities.”

Are you fed up with sanity being left out of “the public political discourse”?
Then have a good laugh while absorbing

some of the best political analysis available!
Time to see some best of Bill Maher and guests like Naomi Klein.
In ascending chronological order:
June 19, 2009
Opening Monolog
“the AMA, if you’re not sick, we’re not doing our job” ; 7:38
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9XhhKwppeO8&feature=related
New Rules
“Democrats have become Republican lite” ; 7:51
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DtUAHPYYzeM&feature=related

“bottom line? Democrats are the new republicans”
“we don’t have a left and a right party in this country anymore,
we have a center right party and a crazy party.
And over the last thirty odd years,
Democrats have moved to the right,
and the right has moved into a mental hospital.”

“look folks, i like Obama too, I’m just saying,
let’s not make it a religion. …

every time Obama tries to take on another on another progressive
ccause there’s a major political party standing in his way,
the Democrats.
People talk a lot about a third party in America,
we don’t need a third party, we need a first party.
You go to the polls and your choices are the guy who voted for the
first Wall Street bailout, or the guy who voted for the next ten.

This week we’re hearing that a public option for health care is unlikely,
because it doesn’t have the support of enough Democrats.
Even Ted Kennedy’s plan (Ted Kennedy yeah!),
leaves 37 million uninsured.

This is because we don’t have a left and a right party
in this country anymore,
we have a center right party and a crazy party.
And over the last thirty odd years,
Democrats have moved to the right,
and the right has moved into a mental hospital.

So, what we have is one perfectly good party for hedge fund managers,
credit card companies, banks, defense contractors, big agriculture,
and the pharmaceutical lobby, that’s the Democrats,
and they sit across the aisle from a small group of religious fanatics,
flat earthers, and Civil War reenacters,
who mostly communicate by AM radio
and call themselves the Republicans.
And who actually worry that Obama is a Socialist.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DtUAHPYYzeM&feature=related 7:51
——————————————————————————————-

 

In case you think it is just Bill and I who feel this way, here are some reports of
a couple recent polls that show we are not alone in being disappointed about Dem’s performance this year:


Strategists Worry Obama’s Popularity is Dropping – Kenneth T. Walsh - July 1, 2009
Some worry Obama’s honeymoon with the public and the media may be over
http://www.usnews.com/articles/news/obama/2009/07/01/strategists-worry-obamas-popularity-is-dropping.html
Rasmussen Poll: Obama’s Popularity Plunging – June 30, 2009 7:27 PM
http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/obama_rasmussen_poll/2009/06/30/230686.html
Barack Obama’s honeymoon with voters is over, polls suggests – June 23, 2009
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article6557276.ece
Barack Obama’s honeymoon on the wane – June 19, 2009
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25656299-2703,00.html
“Obama honeymoon coming to an end”: NBC - Jun 18, 2009 9:59am EDT
http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSTRE55H36820090618
Honeymoon Over: It’s On Obama’s Watch Now – June 18, 2009 – 12:26 a.m.
http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=news-000003146528
——————————————————————————————-
6-19-09
Overtime with Bill Maher; opening ; 6:00
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPd_uqjeYCg&feature=related
6-19-09
Overtime: Paul Begala Schools Meghan McCain!;4:33
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oiVlZo6a5aA&feature=related

6-19-09
CNN Situation Room ; 1:34
“This country needs a left wing. It doesn’t have it.
And part of the reason is the media!”
http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/checker.aspx?v=ydaGZuqGnz
http://www.mrc.org/biasalert/2009/20090616100543.aspx

JUNE 16, 2009
CNN: Maher explains Obama criticism; defends Letterman ; 6:09
“The way George Bush… He didn’t care if it was approved …

 

 

by the Magna Carta! He just did what he wanted to do.
And i would like to see a bit of that,
in Barak Obama.”
http://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid6555681001?bctid=26554158001
http://www.thrfeed.com/2009/06/bill-maher-obama-david-letterman.html 

June 15, 2009
Keith Olbermann; Countdown: Bill Maher Talks About Taking On Obama ; 6:04
“where’s the beef?
and it’s easy to make speeches,
and what’s hard to do is stand up against corporations.
Corporations, and their incredible strength
are what has ruined this country, so far…
If not now, when?”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJ2L1aQy-io
http://tigger500.typepad.com/thoughts/2009/06/more-on-bill-mahers-obama-critique.html

June 13, 2009 ;
“you don’t have to be on TV everyday, you’re the President”; 5:22
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HWulnfog20c

April 10, 2009
Ron Howard on Realtime with Bill Maher ; 4:28
“Look, if you’re gonna make an endorsement like that,
you know, start, start by humiliating your self, a and a um,
and then be as modest about it as possible.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1CgbvIasKUA&feature=related 

March 28, 2009
Bill Maher discusses Obama’s Marijuana statement ; 9:55
with Salmon Rushdie, Mos Def, Christopher Hitchens
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TqAOnUbvNn0

March 27, 2009
Mos Def Vs Christopher Hitchens, with Salmon Rushdie ; 8:48
(if confused, refer to November 16, 2008)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKwziTJfMbg&feature=related

March 07, 2009
Bill Maher smacks down Wall Street ; 5:17
“”hang them from the stock exchange”", ”with their balls in their mouth”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8EGzEv21dw&feature=related

March 6, 2009
Bill Maher Explains the Healthcare Crisis; too good to quote ; 1:35
memorize it
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aitvFZTOrp4&feature=related

January 08, 2009
Bill Maher And Barack Obama on Yahoo News
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nh8i_FzHVTU&feature=related

January 05, 2009
Bill Maher rant on Big Pharma - Pharmaceutical industry
vs nutrition and common sense ; 3:59
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ot6x7cx9f7k&feature=related

November 18, 2008
Janeane Garofalo Making alot of sense on Bill Maher ; 9:34
“Custer Battles” (TM)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PT5SA71vETk&feature=related 

November 16, 2008
Mos Def and Bill Maher - Pollitics ; 10:38
“I’m from the projects, I know danger,
I don’t feel no danger from that shit” (terrorism)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EvO5kD4yr1Y&feature=related

November 10, 2008
Bill Maher New Rules about Obama’s Victory 6:12
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L0TEc4Kg9VU&feature=related 
September 19, 2008
Naomi Klein on Real Time Live with Bill Maher w/ Shock Doctrine ; 8:13
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCHBLt-w9wE&feature=related

September 20, 2008
Most IMPORTANT Point EVER Made by Bill Maher!!! ; 3:41
“Terrorism, as bad as it is, should not control our lives”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmCC_jasq0E&feature=related

11 April 2008
“Atheist” Richard Dawkins on Bill Maher ; 6:26
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4tRpbkpNpgw&feature=related
March 01, 2008
“Atheist” Christopher Hitchens W/ Bill Maher Mashup ; 6:48
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3viGlD-6STs&feature=related
October 13, 2007
Maher on Blackwater in Iraq ; 5:11
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vtkGMuWNyuY&feature=related

October 13, 2007
Naomi Klein’s ”Shock Doctrine” on Maher; from Amsterdam ; 5:39
“now we all know that it’s Comunism is when the government
takes over private business, but,
when Corporations take over the government
that is what has been defined as Facism.
Do you think that’s where we’re at?
“Yeah, or Corporatism …
you can call it crony capitalism or corporatism,
but it’s certianly not the free market”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UHMuiJwM23M&feature=related

May 14, 2007
Bill Maher interviews Christoper Hitchens ; 6:29
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qqNKD_nmXqM&feature=related

Who’s at the Health Care Reform Table Besides Corp’s(es’) Lobbies?

Today a local Peace list I’m on, and the Green Party US National Committee Discussion List,
both synergized me on this kore important issue that shows lobbyists easily cajoling politicians
into severely dropping the people’s ball once again on this critically out of control issue.
Apparently 54% – 65% of us* (and 59% of physicians**), want single payer, or some such similar
plan, yet such a plan is not even on the table.
http://www.grahamazon.com/over/2008/01/poll-shows-majority-support-single-payer/
   http://news.yahoo.com/page/election-2008-political-pulse-voter-worries-highlights;_ylt=AkO9w4FTYhpdbrgapp1RIB9QzpB4
** http://www.reuters.com/article/latestCrisis/idUSN31432035
The lobbyists at the table are inclining bargaining towards even more of the worst exacerbations of
the excesses of the current system. Things like requiring us all to funnel our money through the
current (lack of a) system (of private insurers) designed to profit by taking our money to spend much
of it deciding to deny us care our doctors know we need.
An Opaque System
We do not need solutions that exacerbate the core human and financial issues. One isssue that is
largely being ignored by the focus on the interests of the insurance and drug industries is the huge
cost of admin for he current system. 31% of US health spending goes to admin*, much of that cost
is spent submitting paperwork to a plethora of providers so they can spend much of their overhead
deciding who to deny care to.
http://www.pnhp.org/single_payer_resources/administrative_waste_consumes_31_percent_of_health_spending.php
“Taxes already pay for more than 60 percent of US health spending. Americans pay the highest
health care taxes in the world. We pay for national health insurance, but don’t get it.”*
http://www.pnhp.org/single_payer_resources/60_percent_of_health_spending_is_already_publicly_financed_enough_to_cover_everyone.php
Because the right wing wants to focus on personal responsibility, they have allowed an atmosphere
that has fostered conditions conducive to the giants of finance, insurance, banking, credit, and loans
industries, allowing them to make huge profits from writing the laws their way. They say they do this
to allow more of a “free market” in what has become a tidal wave of personal misery bouying up
profits within the industry and depreseing wages across the board. Still medical bills contribute to
half of all personal bankruptcies*, and yet 3/4 of those recently bankrupted had coverage when their
health issues started them on the road to financial ruin.
http://www.reuters.com/article/latestCrisis/idUSN31432035
The biggest inefficiency of all is that our collective social and security needs require us to administer
emergency care to those without real care; those who would have fared much better with better
primary and preventitive care force the taxpayers and insurance consumers to subsidize the care of
the very poor very inefficiently. This is to say nothing of costs of the human misery of the pain,
disease, and crimes that transpire as a result.
There seems to be no end to the number of health care professionals and other activists they will
arrest to keep the phrase “single payer” out of the chambers of legislation*.
http://www.healthcare-now.org/real-news-network-single-payer-advocates-protest-senate-hearing-video/
   http://www.somdnews.com/stories/05082009/entetop163119_32200.shtml
   http://www.healthcare-now.org/five-more-single-payer-protesters-arrested/
   http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/05/12/1929527.aspx
   http://health.mashget.com/2009/05/12/five-single-payer-protestors-arrested/
If you look closely at the process writing this legislation, you will see much happening that
underscores the degree to which justice is not being done to one of the the two main desires or
hopes that were so boldy expressed last Nov. I will address war another time, here we focus on the
positive side, what we do want and need? health care that makes sense!!!
Still we see a legislative process that is willing to waste immense amounts of wealth and human
capital through the process of essentially expanding human misery to create a market that favors
larger profits for inhuman corps.
Bill Moyers explores “Who is at the Table?
Bill takes note of how many times we’ve already bought this bill of goods,
“don’t worry we’ll cut costs voluntarilly, sure. Now health care cots are rising 6% a year.
Anyone with a memory could be excused for raising their eyebrows at these latest promises”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wi1acHg3mhw (June 04, 2009)
with additional links and comments:
http://anycarinsurance.com/2009/06/bill-moyers-journal-single-payer-health-insurance-pbs/

Who Will Be at the Table Archive
Trudy Lieberman is up to 9 articles in her series so far:
http://www.cjr.org/campaign_desk/who_will_be_at_the_table_archi.php
Compare the Three Major Offerings on the Table With the Kaiser Foundation‘s Help.
http://www.kff.org/healthreform/sidebyside.cfm
Rhonda has a perspective that most of us need to learn from.
This was the most informative article i read today, and that’s really saying something!
Debunking Canadian health care myths
By Rhonda Hackett; POSTED: 06/07/2009 01:00:00 AM MDT
http://www.denverpost.com/opinion/ci_12523427
What do we pay for, anyway?
As a Canadian living in the United States for the past 17 years, I am frequently asked by Americans
and Canadians alike to declare one health care system as the better one.
Often I’ll avoid answering, regardless of the questioner’s nationality. To choose one or the other
system usually translates into a heated discussion of each one’s merits, pitfalls, and an intense
recitation of commonly cited statistical comparisons of the two systems.
Because if the only way we compared the two systems was with statistics, there is a clear victor.
It is becoming increasingly more difficult to dispute the fact that Canada spends less money on
health care to get better outcomes.
Yet, the debate rages on. Indeed, it has reached a fever pitch since President Barack Obama took
office, with Americans either dreading or hoping for the dawn of a single-payer health care system.
Opponents of such a system cite Canada as the best example of what not to do, while proponents
laud that very same Canadian system as the answer to all of America’s health care problems.
Frankly, both sides often get things wrong when trotting out Canada to further their respective
arguments.
As America comes to grips with the reality that changes are desperately needed within its health
care infrastructure, it might prove useful to first debunk some myths about the Canadian system.
Myth: Taxes in Canada are extremely high, mostly because of national health care.
In actuality, taxes are nearly equal on both sides of the border. Overall, Canada’s taxes are slightly
higher than those in the U.S. However, Canadians are afforded many benefits for their tax dollars,
even beyond health care (e.g., tax credits, family allowance, cheaper higher education), so the end
result is a wash. At the end of the day, the average after-tax income of Canadian workers is equal to
about 82 percent of their gross pay. In the U.S., that average is 81.9 percent.
Myth: Canada’s health care system is a cumbersome bureaucracy.
The U.S. has the most bureaucratic health care system in the world. More than 31 percent of every
dollar spent on health care in the U.S. goes to paperwork, overhead, CEO salaries, profits, etc.
The provincial single-payer system in Canada operates with just a 1 percent overhead.
Think about it. It is not necessary to spend a huge amount of money to decide who gets
care and who doesn’t when everybody is covered.
Myth: The Canadian system is significantly more expensive than that of the U.S.Ten percent of
Canada’s GDP is spent on health care for 100 percent of the population. The U.S. spends 17 percent
of its GDP but 15 percent of its population has no coverage whatsoever and millions of others have
inadequate coverage. In essence, the U.S. system is considerably more expensive than Canada’s.
Part of the reason for this is uninsured and underinsured people in the U.S. still get sick and
eventually seek care. People who cannot afford care wait until advanced stages of an illness to see
a doctor and then do so through emergency rooms, which cost considerably more than primary care
services.
What the American taxpayer may not realize is that such care costs about $45 billion per year,
and someone has to pay it. This is why insurance premiums increase every year for insured patients
while co-pays and deductibles also rise rapidly.
Myth: Canada’s government decides who gets health care and when they get it.While HMOs and
other private medical insurers in the U.S. do indeed make such decisions, the only people in Canada
to do so are physicians. In Canada, the government has absolutely no say in who gets care or how
they get it. Medical decisions are left entirely up to doctors, as they should be.
There are no requirements for pre-authorization whatsoever. If your family doctor says you need an
MRI, you get one. In the U.S., if an insurance administrator says you are not getting an MRI,
you don’t get one no matter what your doctor thinks — unless, of course, you have the money to
cover the cost.
Myth: There are long waits for care, which compromise access to care.There are no waits for urgent
or primary care in Canada. There are reasonable waits for most specialists’ care, and much longer
waits for elective surgery. Yes, there are those instances where a patient can wait up to a month for
radiation therapy for breast cancer or prostate cancer, for example. However, the wait has nothing to
do with money per se, but everything to do with the lack of radiation therapists. Despite such waits,
however, it is noteworthy that Canada boasts lower incident and mortality rates than the U.S. for all
cancers combined, according to the U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group and the Canadian Cancer
Society. Moreover, fewer Canadians (11.3 percent) than Americans (14.4 percent) admit unmet health
care needs.
Myth: Canadians are paying out of pocket to come to the U.S. for medical care.Most patients who
come from Canada to the U.S. for health care are those whose costs are covered by the Canadian
governments. If a Canadian goes outside of the country to get services that are deemed medically
necessary, not experimental, and are not available at home for whatever reason (e.g., shortage or
absence of high tech medical equipment; a longer wait for service than is medically prudent; or lack
of physician expertise), the provincial government where you live fully funds your care. Those
patients who do come to the U.S. for care and pay out of pocket are those who perceive their care to
be more urgent than it likely is.
Myth: Canada is a socialized health care system in which the government runs hospitals and where
doctors work for the government.Princeton University health economist Uwe Reinhardt says single-
payer systems are not “socialized medicine” but “social insurance” systems because doctors work in
the private sector while their pay comes from a public source. Most physicians in Canada are self-
employed. They are not employees of the government nor are they accountable to the government.
Doctors are accountable to their patients only. More than 90 percent of physicians in Canada are paid
on a fee-for-service basis. Claims are submitted to a single provincial health care plan for
reimbursement, whereas in the U.S., claims are submitted to a multitude of insurance providers.
Moreover, Canadian hospitals are controlled by private boards and/or regional health authorities
rather than being part of or run by the government.
Myth: There aren’t enough doctors in Canada.
From a purely statistical standpoint, there are enough physicians in Canada to meet the health care
needs of its people. But most doctors practice in large urban areas, leaving rural areas with bona
fide shortages. This situation is no different than that being experienced in the U.S. Simply training
and employing more doctors is not likely to have any significant impact on this specific problem.
Whatever issues there are with having an adequate number of doctors in any one geographical area,
they have nothing to do with the single-payer system.
And these are just some of the myths about the Canadian health care system. While emulating the
Canadian system will likely not fix U.S. health care, it probably isn’t the big bad “socialist” bogeyman
it has been made out to be.
It is not a perfect system, but it has its merits. For people like my 55-year-old Aunt Betty, who has
been waiting for 14 months for knee-replacement surgery due to a long history of arthritis, it is the
superior system. Her $35,000-plus surgery is finally scheduled for next month. She has been in pain,
and her quality of life has been compromised. However, there is a light at the end of the tunnel.
Aunt Betty — who lives on a fixed income and could never afford private health insurance, much less
the cost of the surgery and requisite follow-up care — will soon sport a new, high-tech knee. Waiting
14 months for the procedure is easy when the alternative is living in pain for the rest of your life.
Rhonda Hackett of Castle Rock is a clinical psychologist.
© 2009 The Denver Post
The other side, USians familiar with the Canadian system:
Americans Who’ve Used Canada’s Health-Care System Respond to Current Big-Lie Media Campaign
June 13,2009 – Bill Mann
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bill-mann/americans-whove-used-cana_b_215256.html

Not long ago, the CBC asked Canadians to nominate and then vote for The Greatest Canadian in history.

Thousands responded.

The winner? Not Wayne Gretzky, as I expected (although the hockey great DID make the Top 10).

Not even Alexander Graham Bell, another finalist.

The greatest Canadian ever?

Tommy Douglas.

Who? Tommy Douglas was a Canadian politician – and the father of Canadian universal health care.

 

The Healthcare War is Now Official
ROBERT REICH; THURSDAY, JUNE 11, 2009
http://robertreich.blogspot.com/
Yesterday the American Medical Association came out against a public option for health care. And
yesterday the President reaffirmed his support for it. The next weeks will show what Obama is made
of — whether he’s willing and able to take on the most formidable lobbying coalition he has faced so
far on an issue that will define his presidency.
And make no mistake: A public option large enough to have bargaining leverage to drive down drug
prices and private-insurance premiums is the defining issue of universal health care. It’s the only
way to make health care affordable. It’s the only way to prevent Medicare and Medicaid from eating
up future federal budgets. An ersatz public option — whether Kent Conrad’s non-profit cooperatives,
Olympia Snowe’s “trigger,” or regulated state-run plans — won’t do squat.
The last president to successfully take on the giant health care lobbies was LBJ. He got Medicare and
Medicaid enacted because he weighed into the details, twisted congressional arms, threatened and
cajoled, drew lines in the sand, and went to war against the AMA and the other giant lobbyists
standing in the way. The question now is how much LBJ is in Barack Obama.
The big guns are out and they’re firing. All major lobbying firms in Washington — many of them
brimming with ex-members of Congress — are now crawling all over the Hill. Lots of money is on the
table. AMA’s political action committee has contributed $9.8 million to congressional candidates
since 2000, and its lobbying arm is one of the most formidable on the Hill. Meanwhile, Big Insurance
and Big Pharma are increasing their firepower. The five largest private insurers and their trade group
America’s Health Insurance Plans spent a total of $6.4 million on lobbying in the first quarter of this
year, up more than $1 million from the first quarter last year, and are spending even more now.
United Health Group spent $1.5 million in the first quarter, up 34 percent from the $1.1 million it
spent in the first quarter last year. Aetna spent $809,793 between January and the end of March,
up 41 percent from last year. Pfizer, the world’s biggest drugmaker, spent more than $6.1 million on
lobbying between January and March, more than double what it spent last year. It also spent nearly
$3.3 million lobbying in the fourth quarter of 2008. Every one of them is upping their spending.
Some congressional Democrats are willing and able to stand up to this barrage. Many are not.
They need cover from the White House.
The President can’t do this alone. You must weigh in and get everyone you know to weigh in, too.
Bombard your senators and representatives. Organize and mobilize others. And let the White House
know how strongly you feel. This is one of those battles that define a presidency. But more
importantly, it’s one of those battles that define the state of American democracy.
Reich followed this with an appearance on Bill Moyers Journal Friday evening. June 12, 2009.
Bill asks, “Will he (Obama) push back?”
http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/06122009/profile.html
I quote only a short bit with my highlighting a few key pints.
*BILL MOYERS: *Wait a minute. The folks who are fighting for single-payer out there say it is
feasible if only Congress would look at the economics of it.
*ROBERT REICH: *Well, a lot of things are feasible if Congress looks at the economics of them.
But politically, no, unfortunately and I’m a big single-payer fan. Unfortunately, *we cannot get there
from here because the political forces are just too strong against single-payer.*
*BILL MOYERS: *Are the business forces prescient when they say that if we get a public option, it
opens the door down the road to single-payer?
*ROBERT REICH: *If the government simply requires that the public option pay for itself, can be not-
for-profit, just pays for itself that’s not going to be necessarily a direct opening to single-payer.
But it is going to force the private insurers and the drug companies and the medical suppliers to be
honest, to control costs, and to provide better quality.
*BILL MOYERS: *You’ve got these powerful lobbies that you’ve been writing about on your blog.
And you said on your blog this week that the real question for you is the extent to which Barack
Obama will push back against these lobbies. What’s your answer to your own question?
*ROBERT REICH: *I don’t know, Bill. This is the first test where there is huge organized opposition.
And it’s coming from very, very powerful lobbies who have prevailed– not just for ten or 15 years.
You’ve prevailed for decades on this issue. So this is the truth time in terms of how able and willing
the President and the White House is to really set boundaries and push members of Congress.
*So it’s at this point– and I’m talking about the next two or three or four weeks. I mean, we’re
talking about crunch time right now– that the President has got to step in and be forceful and be
specific. And I don’t know whether he will be. I hope he is.*
Bill Moyer’s Profile of Reich
http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/06122009/profile.html
Single-Payer: Is Nationalized Health Coverage the Way to Go?
Bill Moyers; 2009 05
http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/blog/2009/05/singlepayer_is_nationalized_he.html
Health Reform for Beginners: The Difference Between Socialized Medicine, Single-Payer Health
Care, and What We’ll Be Getting Ezra Klien
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2009/06/health_reform_for_beginners_th_1.html
Do You Think Socialized Medicine Would Be:
Better – 45%
Worse – 39%
About the Same – 4%
Who Knows – 12%
I’ve been meaning to write this post for some time. The words “socialized medicine” and”single-
payer health care” get thrown around with such gleeful abandon that they’ve both become a bit
unmoored from their actual meanings. In the American health-care debate, they tend to refer to
“whatever the Democrats are proposing.” But that’s not what they mean.
Socialized medicine is a system in which the government owns the means of providing medicine.
Britain is an example of socialized system, as, in America, is the Veterans Health Administration.
In a socialized system, the government employs the doctors and nurses, builds and owns the
hospitals, and bargains for and purchases the technology. I have literally never heard a proposal
for converting America to a socialized system of medicine. And I know a lot of liberals.
Single-payer health care is not socialized medicine. It’s a system in which one institution purchases
all, or in reality, most, of the care. But the payer does not own the doctors or the hospitals or the
nurses or the MRI scanners. Medicare is an example of a mostly single-payer system, as is France.
Both of these systems have private insurers to choose from, but the government is the dominant
purchaser. (As an aside here, unlike in socialized medicine, “single-payer health care” has nothing in
particular to do with the government. The state might be the single payer. But if Aetna managed to
wrest 100 percent of the health insurance market, then it would be the single payer.
The term refers to market share, not federal control.)
Socialized medicine is far outside any discussion we’re having. Single-payer medicine has a genuine
constituency but is also a vanishingly unlikely outcome. But the promiscuous use of the terms has
created a rather confused population. “Socialized medicine” is the thing we don’t have. In some case,
it’s the thing we don’t like. The graph atop this post comes from a poll conducted by the Harvard
School of Public Health. They found that Americans actually preferred socialized medicine to our
system. Or take this question, about our current system:
Is The Following “Socialized Medicine?”:
HMOs – 31%
Veteran’s Health – 47%
Medicare – 60
(numbers rounded off)
You’re reading that right. About 30 percent of Americans think HMOs are socialized medicine.
Which implies a couple things. First, the term “socialized medicine” has been diluted beyond all
meaning. Second, it’s no longer considered a terrifying outcome. And third, nothing that’s this
amorphous — and actually preferred by a plurality of the population — is likely to prove a terribly
effective attack against health reform. Socialized medicine has become such a stand-in for “not this
system of medicine” that it’s begun to look good in comparison.
Meanwhile, what we’re actually going to get is not socialized medicine or single-payer health care.
It’s a hybrid system. Private insurers, hopefully competing with a public option. Private doctors and
private hospitals. Government regulation and subsidies. It’s going to be complicated and messy and
inefficient and hopeful and the product of a strange mix of corporate preferences and public
compassion and latent populism. It will, in other words, be a uniquely American system, and hard to
describe with a single epithet.
Obama and the Lobbyist
Frank Blair
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/milwaukeepeace/message/2396
I have gone on record numerous times in the past as saying that none of us…as voters…has as
much to say about how the government is run as do the lobbying groups in Washington.  They run
a massive industry on K Street in the nation’s capital.  True, there are “good” lobbyists as well as
those who would oppose legislation which would seem as being advantageous to the people at large
but for the most part it is the lobbyists with the most money….millions of dollars….who grease the
outstretched palms of our elected politicians.
Such an advantage is now being debated everwhere.  I am talking about the reformed health care
plan under which a large segment of the population in the US which is uninsured would have
available a government proposal guaranteeing that they would have a plan insuring them of
adequate coverage.
Robert Reich, former Secretary of Labor in Bill Clinton’s cabinet, raises a critical question on this
morning’s AlterNet.  Reich has always been a sane voice in what has often been a babble of talk.
 And he raises the question of whether President Obama has the fortitude (one might say “guts”) to
confront the lobbyists as they seek to prevent a health care plan forthcoming.   In particular he cites
Big Insurance, Big Pharma but most of all (and this may surprise many),  the American Medical
Association, as opposing health reform.  Millions of dollars are waiting to be thrown into the battle.
The question remains whether Obama has anything beyond a smooth oratorical talent to oppose
these lobbyists.  Reich has this to say about Medicare and Medicaid which came into being under the
tutelage of LBJ in the 1960s:
             “The last president to succesfully take on the giant
              health care lobbies was LBJ. He got Medicare and
              Medicaid enacted because he weighed into the details,
              twisted congressional arms, threatened and cajoled,
              drew lines in the sand and went to war against the AMA
              and the other giant lobbyists standing in the way.  The
              question now is how much LBJ is in Barack Obama.”
This indeed is the question.  Lobby groups are powerful entities and throw their weight around in
ways that are hard to resist especially when they contribute to the political funds of those who
legislate!
Will Obama be up to the task?   That is the million dollar question.
Email Comment
Scott McLarty, GPUS Media Coordinator; Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 5:34 PM
Greens “need to take stock of reality and get out the message that Single-Payer will only be possible
when the political landscape changes.
The only hope of changing the political landscape in a way that will lead to Single-Payer’s enactment
(and a lot of other real & systematic changes) is the emergence of a strong alternative party that
doesn’t take money & orders from corporate lobbies.” (Green Parties don’t)
Physicians for a National Health Program
is an excellent source of mind blowing info about health care reform:
http://www.pnhp.org/
http://www.pnhp.org/single_payer_resources/pnhp_research_the_case_for_a_national_health_program.php
The Green Party US on Health Care Reform in 2009:

President Obama can either work to enact health care for all Americans or he can support insurance and HMO industry profits, say Greens,
January 29, 2009 - http://gp.org/press/pr-national.php?ID=174
Greens urge widespread protest over President Obama’s exclusion of Single-Payer/Medicare For All advocates from the March 5 health care reform summit at the White House Wednesday,
March 4, 2009 - http://gp.org/press/pr-national.php?ID=188

America needs Single-Payer, not the public health care option, say Greens Tuesday
May 26, 2009 - http://gp.org/press/pr-national.php?ID=216
Greens prepare for the national Day of Action promoting Single-Payer national health care on May 30,
May 28, 2009 - http://gp.org/press/pr-national.php?ID=218
Green Party leaders challenge Sen. Baucus and defenders of private insurance to debate Single-Payer advocates, 
June 4, 2009- http://gp.org/press/pr-national.php?ID=221

Ready for Even More Ever Bigger Coal?

Potential profits of 100s of new plants are buying next week’s House vote.

please go here and sign moveon.org’s petition

http://pol.moveon.org/cleanairact/

while i’m not a big fan of Move On, they have made it too easy not to pass up this opportunity to send a message.
Do them one better and send an email, snail mail, or a phone call to your Rep.

Congress is voting on the big energy bill next week.
But the latest version of the energy bill would repeal a key part of the Clean Air Act -
arguably the most important environmental law in American history.

Big coal companies want to revoke President Obama’s authority to crack down on global warming pollution
from their dirty power plants — and they’re on the verge of winning.

If they succeed, the oldest and dirtiest coal plants could keep destroying the climate for years to come.
And this change could pave the way for 100 new coal plants,
which would pollute our communities with smog, soot, mercury, and global warming pollution.

I signed a petition urging Congress not to repeal this Clean Air Act provision.
Can you join me at the link above?

Sources:

1. “EPA urged to act on climate, not wait for Congress,” Associated Press, May 18, 2009

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gFfOn9fGm50O9nEQAVTgGHUiK_pwD988OG100

 

H.R.2454

American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 (Introduced in House)

Library of Congress, May 15, 2009

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.R.2454:

 

2. “Stopping the Coal Rush,” Sierra Club

“Find up to date status information about proposed coal plants across the country.”

http://www.sierraclub.org/environmentallaw/coal/plantlist.asp

 

3. “Taking on King Coal,” Time,

BRYAN WALSH Wednesday, Nov. 05, 2008

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1856987,00.html

By the Corps(es), For the Corps(es), Of the People?

There is no way to penalize a corporation (or a government) that does not actually hurt people instead.
At least when the paper overlord is a government, we have the illusion of owning it; who owns the
largest conglomerates that actually write the laws and pay for the votes that pass them?
Conglomerates all own each other.

“We are all back seat drivers, & there’s nobody at the wheel”

(Timbuk 3 ’Reverend Jack and His Roamin’ Cadillac Church’)

Hence it is our imaginary overlords who actually ”govern” our planetary scale decision making.

They originally came about by human authored rules and laws, and existed only on fragile pieces of

paper, but have now transcended paper and even nature’s laws, making over humans, and even the
world itself, as the fragile illusions of permanence; for the only laws that matter are the ones they
themselves have written. A human that imagines any humans to have power, or the ability to
conspire with other humans, or even the power not to conspire with corps(es), is simply deluded.

Humans will only return to governance of human affairs when they have collectively made the choice

to stop imagining otherwise.

No matter how one looks at it, there is an ongoing attempt to have immortal ’paper’ imaginary

citizens rule the world of living mortal actual beings.
How do we stop it? Even more to the point, why did we ever allow it? Occasionally some, such as myself,
will point out that imaginary immortal beings are neither equipped to understand,
nor prioritize, the needs of living mortals, and the fragile planetary
organism our breath and tears are part of.
They cannot even be made care to obey nature’s law.

Socialism of, by, and for the corps(es), with the goal of world dominion; Does Fox ”News” actually

hate such socialism?
or do they consciously promote it by opposing any advancement of the human cause?How again is it we are not a national socialist governed nation?Does that not apply to massacring Arabs over there instead of Jews here in the homeland?

War always kills and impoverishes human people and it always profits corps(es),

if you try to stop it they will cry out for their 18th amendment rights (which they don’t have).
If you want to kill our real enemies, simply stop believing in their imaginary power to compel us
based on an imaginary legal equality with actual citizens.

What’s really on my mind? don’t have one anymore.

Watched the Fox News channel comedy show called Red Eye tonight,
they cured me. Now i’m right all the time, i know everything, i don’t need a mind of my own,
and i finally get the whole concept of buying an Amerikkkan soul for myself.
THEY RULE! WE RULE!! EVERYONE ELSE SUCKS!!!
(if the whole world sucks enough then us true believers won’t suck at all)

Blind faith, and a belief that things will always remain just as one grew up believing them to be

are the only excuses we have for our stupidity. They are not very good excuses, but when it comes
to a reason to follow the herd of lemmings it appears most of us need only the thinest of veneers.
That’s what happens to social mammals,
but it’s a cruel twist of the inevitable that brings us to a
place where we don’t believe in the need for us to work and play well together
even though we are less equipped than any other animal
to survive au natural alone.
Faith in the imaginary overlords is the only excuse we have
for having such little faith in ourselves.

Two good examples: those who call for war often claim Jesus’s Love, just as those who call for

corporate welfare often cry out for a free market.

Let’s just make the whole mess much simpler and more honest by evolving a religion based on the

axiom that unexamined selfishness is the only greater good. The only way you get into heaven is
by out pacing the Jones, preferably by stealing from your neighbor.

We can cut the middle man right out and worship the conglomerates who are our actual lords,

those with thoughtful minds can make an analogy to the angels (not the fallen ones of course,
have some faith in blind belief).

Donald Trump can be the prophet, or the sacrificial lamb, and GW Bush can wash his hands of us all,

while the entire Dow family becomes enlightenment itself. Monsanto can be the savior of the world’s
threatened monocultures and self replicating organisms can play the role of Judas.

Damn! i think i’m half there already…
So who wants to put something in my collection plate to get the ball rolling?

“give them the protagonist’s role” Mauricio Funes

Now, what we’re going to do is put the government and the structure of the state
at the service of the Salvadoran people–the totality of the Salvadoran people-
-but fundamentally, of that great majority who are oppressed and excluded from
the country’s social and economic development. [The people who for]
not just the last twenty years but for last 200 years or more
have not had the possibility of participating in the formation of public policies.
A government like the one I’m going to create will give them the protagonist’s role,
which, until now, they have not had.”
Mauricio Funes
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20090330/lovato?rel=hp_picks

The Nation magazine is running an interview (following) with Mauricio Funes,
elected a few days ago to be the first leftist president of El Salvador.
Most leftists in the world question his identifying with “the left,”
as he appears to be quite conservative. But make no mistake,
the progressive community of the world sees this victory as a step up for El Salvador,
which has been ruled by extremely brutal right wing fascists for a long time –Jack

A Conversation with Mauricio Funes

By Roberto Lovato & Josue Rojas
On March 15, the Farabundo Marti National Liberation Front (FMLN)
became the first leftist party to clinch a presidential election in the history of El Salvador.
By 10 pm, it became clear to Salvadorans and to the world that the former guerrillas
had ended more than 130 years of oligarchy and military rule
over this Central American nation of 7 million.
In the streets, thousands of red-shirted sympathizers chanted “¡Si Se Pudo!” (Yes, We Could),
while they celebrated the victory of the FMLN’s Mauricio Funes.
Funes captured 51 percent of the vote, to 49 percent cast for Rodrigo Avila of the Nationalist Republican Alliance party, which had been in power for twenty years.
Though Funes, a former journalist, is the best-known Salvadoran on his country’s TV networks,
he is little known outside the region.
Thanks to a collaboration between The Nation and New America Media (NAM),
reporters Roberto Lovato and Josue Rojas had the opportunity to interview
El Salvador’s next president on the night of his election.
What follows is an excerpt from this interview with Funes, who addressed numerous issues:
the meaning of his presidency, El Salvador’s relationship with the United States,
immigration and other domestic and foreign policy concerns.
Immigration has become one of the defining issues of the US-El Salvador relationship.

How will your administration’s approach to this issue differ from that of the outgoing Saca administration?

The fact that we’re going to rebuild the democratic institutions-
-enforce the constitution and make of El Salvador a democratic state that respects the rule of law-
-is the best guarantee to the United States that we will significantly reduce the flows of out-migration.

Salvadorans who leave to go the United States do so because of the institutional abandonment,
the lack of employment and dignified ways to make a living.
This forces them to leave in search of new possibilities in the US.
It’s not the same for us to ask the US government to renew TPS [temporary legalization]
without a Salvadoran effort to avoid further migration flows,
as to do so from a position in which we have undertaken efforts to reduce the migration flows.

What’s the first message you’d like to send to President Obama?

The message that I would like to send to President Obama
is that I will not seek alliances or accords with other heads of state from the southern part of the continent
who will jeopardize my relationship with the government of the United States.

Opinion polls in El Salvador indicate that large majorities of its citizens reject key policies that define,
in many ways, the relationship between El Salvador and the United States,
specifically CAFTA, dollarization and the Iraq war.
What will your approach be to these issues?

We can’t get mixed up in repealing CAFTA…nor can we reverse dollarization,
because that would send a negative message to foreign investors,
and then we’d be facing serious problems because we wouldn’t have enough investment to stimulate the national economy.

What do you think the United States government should be concerned about with regard to El Salvador at this time?

To the degree that we do our part, which is to rebuild our productive capacity
and to create a coherent social policy that improves the quality of life,
there will be fewer reasons to leave for the US and we’ll reduce migration flows.
And that should be a concern for the US.

Where will the effects of the transition in power be felt most immediately?

We’re going to change the way we make policy.
And one of the most significant changes is that we will no longer have a government
at the service of a privileged few.
And we will no longer have a government that creates an economy of privileges for the privileged.
Now, we need a government like the one envisioned by [Archbishop of El Salvador] Óscar Arnulfo Romero,
who, in his prophetic message, said that the church should have a preferential option for the poor.

Paraphrasing Monseñor Romero, I would say that this government should have preferential option for the poor,
for those who need a robust government to get ahead and to be able to compete in this world
of disequilibrium under fair conditions.

This government implies a break from traditional policy-making.

Now, what we’re going to do is put the government and the structure of the state at the service of the Salvadoran people-
-the totality of the Salvadoran people-
-but fundamentally, of that great majority who are oppressed
and excluded from the country’s social and economic development.
[The people who for] not just the last twenty years but for last 200 years or more
have not had the possibility of participating in the formation of public policies.

A government like the one I’m going to create will give them the protagonist’s role,
which, until now, they have not had.


Activist Arrested for feeding the homeless 2:02
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S4S6v01Sodw

Water Wars have begun
http://cagreening.blogspot.com/search/label/Water%20%20Wars
http://cagreening.blogspot.com/

Green Grassroots Direct Interactive Open Source E-democracy Consensus Seeking

Al Haj Jameel Ghuari endorses Pete Karas for mayor

links from Wikipedia

(?yes to all these things?)
Greens need to know these pages on Wikipedia
if you don’t agree with something, join up and “argue” your case

we especially need to pay attention to the first ten,
or down to the “Democracy” page:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_party

GRASSROOTS:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grassroots_democracy

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bioregional_democracy

http://www.bioregional-congress.org/

CONSENSUS:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consensus_democracy

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consensus_decision-making

http://www.consensus.net/
A Handbook on Formal Consensus Decisionmaking

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abilene_paradox
“a group of people collectively decide on a course of action

that is counter to the preferences of any of the individuals”; see also:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groupthink

DEMOCRACY:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy

Many other important resources,
and concepts important to green governance,
can also be found by navigating close to the Democracy page:

Direct
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_democracy

Participatory
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Participatory_democracy

Transparency
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radical_transparency

Interactive
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy#Interactive

Open
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_source_governance

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Voting_Consortium

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_politics

E-Democracy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-democracy

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_2.0

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technocracy

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netocracy

RESOURCES:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki

http://www.mass-collaboration.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page

http://www.metagovernment.org/wiki/Main_Page

http://www.metagovernment.org/wiki/Related_projects


http://www.democracylab.org/

http://www.socialtext.net/wiki-government-and-democracy/index.cgi

EXAMPLES:
http://www.policeact.govt.nz/wiki/

http://www.futuremelbourne.com.au/wiki/view/FMPlan

http://whitehouse2.org/

for more, see also:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_politics-related_topics

Al Haj Jameel Ghuari endorses Pete Karas for mayor
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jF5fex16Wqc

Tell Congress No! Retain the right to grow food!

This Bill Died In Committee.

soon to be up for a vote is a bill that could stop small and local producers;
HR-875  ‘Food Safety Modernization Act of 2009’
There is a U.S House Resolution…HR875…entitled “The Food Safety Modernization Act”…put forth by Rosa Deloro, a Dem. from CT, whose husband is Stanley Greenberg, who works with many corporations, including Monsanto, that wants EVERYONE who grows ANY food to register and report to the Feds.
Failure to do so results in large fines and potential seizure of property.
I’ve never been poisoned by anything at a farmers market, and it’s none of their business if i choose to grow a strawberry plant or a tomato!
Text of Bills:
HR-875
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-875
S-425
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d111:s425:
HR-875 Meta Data:
http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h875/show
YouTubes:
1:40; INN report; Criminalize Organic Farming? EXCUSE ME?! BILLS: HR 875 and S 425
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epXNJNjYBvw
5:22 (actually @ 2:25-4:20); Don’t Panic! USGovernment to regulate ANY “Farm” – Victory Gardens? RELOAD
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6cTzT8qRIS4&feature=related
8:15; The End of Local Food (HR 875)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GkaNR-bqlrY
google video search:
http://video.google.com/videosearch?hl=en&client=safari&rls=en&ei=lYjCSYahHKCltgeIv4zgCg&resnum=0&q=HR+875&um=1&ie=UTF-8&ei=rIjCSbrdM5_htgepkqXhCg&sa=X&oi=video_result_group&resnum=4&ct=title#
Text Editorials:
Monsanto’s dream bill, HR 875 (followed by an excellent selection of Monsanto GM quotes, and massive good commentary)
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Monsanto-s-dream-bill-HR-by-Linn-Cohen-Cole-090309-337.html
&
http://vegancowprotect.wordpress.com/2009/03/10/monsantos-dream-bill-hr-875/#comment-317
Change We Can Believe In: How About the End of Farmers Markets? Say Hello to H.R. 875: Food Safety Modernization Act of 2009
http://cryptogon.com/?p=7362
HR 875 The food police, criminalizing organic farming and the backyard gardener, and violation of the 10th amendment
http://www.campaignforliberty.com/blog.php?view=12671
HR 875: The End Of Organic Farming?
http://thefinalhour.blogspot.com/2009/03/hr-875-end-of-organic-farming.html
HR875: Your homegrown tomatoes are illegal
http://open.salon.com/blog/gordon_wagner/2009/03/17/hr875_your_homegrown_tomatoes_are_illegal
The End of Organic Farming? How HR875 Could Kill the Farmers Market
http://ezinearticles.com/?The-End-of-Organic-Farming?-How-HR875-Could-Kill-the-Farmers-Market&id=2088965
Social Bookmarks:
http://digg.com/search?section=all&s=Food+Safety+Modernization+Act+of+2009
http://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/84r5m/hr875_which_would_give_more_power_to_monsanto_was/
feel free to plagiarize my wiseacre comment below left on one of these pages;
better yet, write your congress person!
i’m so scared of organic food that i think the government should arm us with assault weapons and rockets and train us to use such in self defense against rabid tomatoes and broccoli
it would probably also make us a whole lot safer if we spread all our nuclear waste evenly over all lands that might be used to grow food consumed in the US just to make sure that even if organic farming techniques are being used anywhere that i won’t have to be attacked by any actually organic food
as to those who would like to give me their extra homegrown zucchinis, i would be happy to entertain the idea of accepting them if you can submit triplicate copies of the paperwork required by this bill to ensure your food facility is safe enough for me and mine

growing vegetables next door without submission of this documentation will require a response from my assault weapons

monte letourneau WI Green Party
Allness Unlimited
http://network.greenchange.org/people/monte
all general statements are false

The Peace Justice and Environment Project

What is the Peace Justice and Environment Project?

 

The Peace Justice and Environment Project (PJEP) is a network of networks using the Actions Options Tool (AOT) web-publishing software as the backbone of their websites. Use of the AOT makes publishing web content easy and efficient while encouraging the communication and cooperation of member groups on common projects. Designed by activists and then developed and refined in the field by those using the software, the AOT is currently being used by over 1000 justice, peace and environment organizations in 26 networks or coalitions covering 33 states throughout the U.S.

 


 

 

The purpose of the web application, the Actions Options Tool (AOT), is to facilitate human-to-human communication. The AOT is not about replacing person-to-person communication with web, email or digital features, but is about encouraging human communication through web and email applications. The AOT has resulted in more real time meetings, phone and conference calls between the individuals and organizations most needed to accomplish specific organization goals. This web application facilitates finding and organizing allies and then getting things done by reaching out and taking action.

 

The Actions Options Tool was designed to encourage organizations to support each other forming connections that strengthen the activist movement. Within each network using the AOT software, organizations post their actions. Actions that garner 55% or greater support and a commitment of participation from 5 other organizations through the AOT action grid will have access to the system’s database for an email blast to publicize their action. That database is created from the emails of those who register or support campaigns on the network. In Illinois, the database contains over 4000 email addresses. Other states have the same potential. Additionally, as the network of activists grows, campaigns travel beyond the borders of a single state.

 

There is a shift in identification as we experience increased contact with those folks that share our experiences. The AOT provides a window and connection to other activists creating an opportunity to experience our self and those around us as very closely allied or tied. Trust and empowerment are experiential and political descriptions of the same human condition. The AOT is a political empowerment tool that enhances an environment of trust by providing guidance and perspective that comes with connection to other individuals and organizations.

Website Organization/Navigation of the 21 State Network Sites of the Peace Justice and Environment Project

 

Home Page Under the Network banner, the Home page displays New Actions and new member organizations added to the network. Further down the page are Announcements and News Articles generated by and for network members.

 

Actions is the home of the AOT Action grid. Here all current actions sponsored by Member organizations are shown on the horizontal axis. A click on each action title will link you to full event details. On the vertical axis, active member groups register their degree of support for the posted actions. A legend at the bottom of the page defines what the degrees of support mean.

 

Calendar events are shown on a single month expanding grid that displays posted actions and has features for recurring vigils, meetings and other events. Place your cursor on each event for the full title, click on the event for full details.

 

Resources gives access to links, documents, videos, audio files books and pictures relating to news & opinion; 43 issue categories; peace, justice & environment organization and activist tools. The search feature within the resources section allows for the speedy recovery of files with names or descriptions with relevant key words.

 

Campaigns has details of network initiated actions for members and registered users: Petitions, Boycotts, E-letters and Fundraisers with a summary showing how close (#s of signatures or $ raised) each campaign is to goal

 

Social Net gives access to the public face of the site’s social networking users along with contact information. Each page has as much or as little information as the social network user desires.

 

MemberOrgs has a full list of network member groups. Click on any name to access the member group’s page (some used as a group’s web presence). Here are links, logos and contact forms to learn about and get in touch with our participating organizations.

 

Networks has a full listing and links to PJEP’s 21 network and coalition websites that serve 26 states.

 

PJEP links to the national website of the Peace Justice and Environment Project.

 

About has our mission statement and describes the benefits of participation in the PJEP network.

 

Contact allows for general inquiries as well as a link for groups interested in joining the network.

 

How Member groups use the Features of PJEP Websites using the AOT

 

Administrator Control Panel has a menu of interactive features to serve member groups. To get access, the system emails each member representative or administrator (you) a temporary password after the website facilitator enters you into the system. Log in using your email address and password. Here is what you’ll find:

 

Profile contains your personal contact information. Here you can re-set your password to one you can easily remember. Include your phone number so your fellow admins can contact you.

 

Organization Information operates as your group’s webpage within the PJEP site. Here you can enter your group’s mission statement, upload your logo and list your group’s website as well as other custom information including links and graphics to appear on theMemberOrg page. Some groups use this space in lieu of their own website.

 

Edit – If you need the make a change re your Organizational information, just click on the “Edit“ button and follow the prompts. Each Control Panel function allows you to edit your information to correct or change information.

 

Message Center (Message Transmission)

In addition to being able to contact your network facilitator or and the committee heads if there is a governing body of the network or coalition, the ‘Message Center’ provides each organization’s representative or “admin” the opportunity to email any other admin within the network or coalition. There is even the option for an admin to email all other network administrators simultaneously.

 

This is not a substitute for a phone call. By far the best way to communicate or solicit support is by picking up the phone and the phone numbers of your fellow admins are located here in the message center.. But sometimes there is no substitute for a rush urgent email transmission to all member organizations. The message center allows you to do so. Use this feature prudently.

 

Actions (The Actions Grid)

Each time you add an action, your event is posted on the website’s Action Grid, inserted onto the Calendar, listed on the home page and an email goes out to each administrator in the network. Your action can be a vigil, forum, talk, visit to elected official, petition, boycott, film showing, speak out, press conference, editorial board meeting, tabling, fundraiser, e-letter or letter to the editor campaign, mass-phone-calls to elected officials, or mass protest. It is the most powerful function of the network.

 

Votes

Each vote you make triggers an email notification to the sponsoring organizations and a vote of support or better becomes a small message of solidarity with those who have worked hard to put on an action. A definition of each vote’s degree of support appears in the legend at the bottom of the Action Grid on the website.

Several activists have noted that the time taken within their organizations to note degrees of support for the actions and events of other organizations has positively influenced the culture of their group. What emerged was an awareness of how closely related actions and activists are across the state.

 

The ‘Actions Offspring’ section provides the opportunity for several closely related actions to congregate in a single area, under a single Action. This section behaves similarly to MoveOn’s programming for multiple location actions allowing the creator of the Action Offspring to note the number of attendees coming to the event, the number of guests allowed and volunteers required. This section of the website can be useful for large organizations with multi location actions.

 

 

Campaigns – Petitions, Boycotts, E-letters and Fundraisers –For the most succesful Campaignwe recommend you also post it as an Action with a link to the PJEP Campaign Page. for example, fundraising for a peace scholarship would have an action asking folks to access the fundraising page and support the effort. As well, all campaigns benefit from a vigorous outreach plan to get as broad support as possible

 

Petitions

By clicking on ‘Add a petition drive’ note the seven steps to a successful petition drive. Petitions are a great way to make connections to organizations in other states. If you create a petition, call the AOT developers at 800 878 1801 and we’ll guide you to organizations in other states that might be interested in sponsoring your petition for that activist community.

 

Our most successful petitions were grounded in emerging current events. An Illinois assemblywoman proposed the impeachment of George Bush in a floor bill. A petition to support the bill was posted on four days later. Within eight days 1000 signatures were gathered and delivered to the Assembly Speaker with television and radio present.

 

Boycotts

By clicking on ‘Add a boycott (located below ‘Boycotts’) note the seven steps to a successful boycott. Although boycotts usually involve strategic long term planning and a multi-state presence, this is not always the case. In July of 2007 it was discovered that British Petroleum had received permission from Indiana EPA to substantially increase its Lake Michigan dumping of ammonia, was already dumping mercury and had applied to increase their atmosphere effluents. Within a week Indiana, Illinois and Michigan AOTs posted boycotts of BP. 700 signatures were gathered in less than a week.

 

If you have sponsoring partners across several states you can get media attention. Call 800 878-1801 for media consultation.

 

E-letters

Modeled after the e-letter centers of national organizations, the AOT e-letter functionality offers the admin of any participating organization (you), the ability to compose and post a letter online, except that it can be modified by a visitor and transmitted to the target chosen by the admin.

 

Stored in the programming are the email addresses of Federal Representatives and Senators or their legislative aides. You can choose the category of target (House members, leaders, etc.) and the AOT software will display that category so a visitor can observe who is being emailed. An upcoming feature will allow you to create a custom target, for example the mayor of a local town, if an e-letter online action requires a localization of the programming.

 

The e-letter center is perhaps the most complicated to setup of the various features of this site. Call 800 878-1801 if you have any questions or would like guidance to make best use of this feature.

 

Fundraisers

Organizations can now create online fundraisers. Fundraisers can focus on an event, promote an action, piggyback on an online campaign, or stand alone as an ongoing way to collect funds. The system only allows credit card contributions. Because of Federal election law, we can not manage fundraisers for political parties.

 

Reporting functionality allows you to analyze your campaign. You can investigate funds collected, obtain specifics on donors and donation amounts, find out when donations came in, etc. Several sorting criteria allow high quality reporting of what works best when using these tools.

 

PJEP will cut a check for the contributions for your campaign whenever there is over $100 in your account on the 15th of the month for the previous month’s receipts minus the credit card processing fee, estimated at 3%. When people make a donation, they will also be asked if they would like to add a voluntary “tip” to PJEP for providing the service to the network. When the campaign end date arrives, a check will be written for the balance of the funds collected for the fundraiser (minus CC fee).

 

Calendar

By plugging in a date & time, providing an event name, description and location you can alert users of the website to the events that your organization would like other network activists to be aware of. Actions are automatically posted on the calendar. The system’s calendar allows for recurring events such as regular peace vigils and meetings.

 

In Pennsylvania, for example, calendar postings were the first text to populate the website. Minnesota’s Coalition uses this feature more than any other section of the site.

 

Articles and Announcements (Home Page Updates)

Each member administrator may post articles and Announcements on the Home Page of your state network. Don’t like what is currently posted on your network’s Home Page? Here you can keep the home page current by posting text pictures or videos relating to your organization’s actions, events and projects or your favorite analysis of peace, justice or environmental events.

 

Announcements have a cut of date when the announcement will be removed. An article will move down the page (and eventually into the system archives) as new content is gets posted on top of it. Announcements will have content relating to a timely event, while the information in posted Articles have a lasing effect.

 

Note the option of using custom formatting, inserting graphics and posting YouTube videos in your Article or Announcement. If you have any questions about this or any other feature of the site call 800 878 1801 and someone will help you.

 

Resources (Links, PDFs, Audio files, Videos, Docs, etc)

The Resource section, overseen by a dedicated committee, is meant to be a one-stop-shopping site or online library for those needing information on how to affect change for social justice. Resource content might be a PDF focusing on an upcoming protest or a detailed document offering long-term perspectives on the movement as a whole.

 

Resources on each network site include general categories available in all states, plus a dedicated section for each site. Admins have the opportunity of adding resources to your state’s resources by following the Control panel prompts. If you wish to submit resources for the general categories, please send an email to laurel [at] pjep [dot] org.

 

Uploads

Here you can upload pictures and documents for display on your Action announcement (for event flyers), MemberOrg page or in a Home Page Article or Announcement. Select upload and follow the prompts to add a file from your own computer. Once uploaded, the system will provide you with a system url for your link or page display. Again, please call 800.878 1801 and someone will answer questions and help you upload and insert content.

 

The Social Networking and Political action Page (SNAPAP)

The social networking and political action page (SNAPAP) offers a host of features never before available in any context let alone a nationwide web of social and political change networks to benefit both individuals or groups.

 

To access these features, register on the site, after which a password will be automatically issued by email. Then users may log in using their email address and system generated password when first logging in to the site. Upon logging in, SNAPAP users who are not also administrators, will be automatically directed to the SNAPAP controls.

 

Profile Window is where you can update your personal information for other to get to know you. Here you can re-set your password to one you easily remember.

 

User Created Resource Center/Favorites Allows users to create a personal digital file library. Here you can search their resources noting only their own contributions or every contribution of every resource or digital file in the system, an alternative universe of left/progressive contributions.

 

Interactive Message Center

A unique feature of SNAPAP is the text message center allowing the storage of multiple phone numbers making possible a transmission of a single text message to numerous activists to drive them to a spontaneous event. Mass text messaging is unique to this form of software.

 

Online Campaigns: SNAPAP offers something extraordinary.

Multiple-degree-of-separation software tracks the indirect influence that an activist exhibits when she or he brings in friends to an online campaign and those friends bring in additional participants. When a user participates in a petition, boycott, e-letter or fundraiser the AOT offers three ways to trace indirect participants in that campaign: 1) when a user refers a friend while signing up for a campaign, 2) when a user sends an invitation from their SNAPAP messaging center, 3) when a friend clicks on the word “participate” when investigating the public view of their SNAPAP page. An activist will discover that bringing in three friends to an online action indirectly leads to the participation of many more. Lineage charts display the specific interconnections that descend from every user.

 

Visit the site for guidance on using these powerful new features or call 800 878-1801 or your facilitator if the information provided isn’t clear.

 

How the Features Work Together

In October 2006, coalitions and networks in Michigan, Illinois and Minnesota all of whom use the AOT programming joined together, to post a petition which called for the Department of Homeland Security to stop live-fire target practice on the Great Lakes using lead ordnance, potentially dumping 7000 lbs of lead into the Lakes annually. Over 1200 signatures and comments were gathered online through the three AOT networks in less than three weeks. In total, almost 400 peace and environmental organizations had been contacted with dozens working in close cooperation as a direct result of the Actions Options Tool programming.

 

As a direct result of the campaigns initiated by the activities of the three state coalitions, the number of hearings, which the Coast Guard held on the issue, was increased to seven from the original four. At one of the hearings, of the 52 people testifying, 50 testified against the live-fire practice. Most of these people were contacted through the AOT programming. Information for the media advisory was pulled from the three AOTs. Numerous television, radio and print stories emerged from the hearings where activists and citizens congregated to make their feelings known. The tool notified, educated, organized and directed the members of member organizations to the targeted event.

 

On December 4, petitions were delivered to Senator Durbin’s aids along with a list of the 37 Illinois organizations supporting the petition. On December 13th the organizers met with Senator Durbin himself. By that meeting, the AOT showed that over 1800 citizens had signed the petition with 44 organizations in support. Durbin supported the activists’ position that the practice should be halted. He said he would set up a meeting to discuss this with those members of the Coast Guard that instituted the policy.

 

On December 18, the Coast Guard announced that they were discontinuing the program with no more live practice on the Great Lakes. Militarization of the Great Lakes was halted. The Dept. of Homeland Security retreat was directly related to the efficiency and ease of use of the Actions Options tool.

 

Grassroots Empowerment at its Best

The website software behind the PJEP networks seeks to lower the level of authority to the local grassroots organization, empowering those organizations across the country with unique and powerful communication tools and online resources. With the recent addition of social networking, we’ve integrated social networking with political action lowering the level of authority even further providing individual activists with knowledge and online features never before available at any level.

 

This is software designed to encourage emerging powerful democratizing forces by enhancing horizontal communication, nurturing transparency and facilitating diversity. By empowering the individual and local grassroots organizations, the AOT seeks to foster creativity where creativity can thrive, with the individual that seeks deep and lasting social change.

Op Ed Ideas

what can you do for our next president?
how to get involved locally in a campaign (would need some help with this one to do it penultimately)
summary of candidates and their positions
future convergence of corp and machine and the need for a more consensual, human, sustainable governace machine
universal spiritual needs and rights and recognition of them in the context of the needs creating the green movement and being expressed thereby, the question of the party’s roles, issues, responsibilities, and limitations, especially as individuals