Alan Watts Remix, Krishna Backup Refrain, Cindy Sheehan’s Call to Arms, PopeBlog

MYTH AMERICA:
20 GREATEST MYTHS OF THE ROBBER CLASS AND THE CASE FOR REVOLUTION
http://www.ipdop.org/myth_america_II_cindy_sheehan_promo.pdf

http://www.nonviolentworm.org/DiaryOfAWorm/20100123-WormsAreNaturalPersonsToo

http://tech.slashdot.org/story/10/01/24/1922211/Pope-Urges-Priests-To-Go-Forth-and-Blog

http://news.slashdot.org/story/10/01/24/1554207/Why-the-IRS-Should-Automatically-Fill-In-Returns-With-What-It-Knows

~ Alan Watts Remix:

“The believer will open his mind to the truth on condition that it fits in with his preconceived ideas and wishes.
Faith, on the other hand, is an unreserved opening of the mind to the truth, whatever it may turn out to be.
Faith has no preconceptions; it is a plunge into the unknown.
Belief clings, but faith lets go. In this sense of the word, faith is the essential virtue of science,
and likewise of any religion that is not self-deception,” fr. “The Wisdom Of Insecurity.”

Zen does not confuse spirituality with thinking about God while one is peeling potatoes.
Zen spirituality is just to peel the potatoes.

We try to pretend, you see, that the external world exists altogether independently of us.

We identify in our experience a differentiation between what we do and what happens to us.

The relationship of self to other is the complete realization that loving yourself is impossible
without loving everything defined as other than yourself.

Underneath the superficial self, which pays attention to this and that, there is another self more really us than I.

You and I are all as much continuous with the physical universe as a wave is continuous with the ocean.

The trouble is, that we have one-sided minds, and we notice the wave of life when it is at its peak or crest.

And the more you become aware of the unknown self – if you become aware of it -
the more you realize that it is inseparably connected with everything else that is.

I find that the sensation of myself as an ego inside a bag of skin is really a hallucination.

Well actually, when you look out there and see all these people and things sitting around,
that’s how it feels inside your head.

The only way to make sense out of change is to plunge into it, move with it, and join the dance.

The Bodhisattva saves all beings, not by preaching sermons to them, but by showing them that they are delivered,
they are liberated, by the act of not being able to stop changing.

So then, in Buddhism, change is emphasized.

You must understand as one of the fundamental points of Buddhism, the idea of the world as being in flux.

The reason we have poverty is that we have no imagination.
There are a great many people accumulating what they think is vast wealth, but it’s only money…
they don’t know how to enjoy it, because they have no imagination.

The reason we want to go on and on is because we live in an impoverished present.

“The more we try to catch hold of the present moment the more elusive it
becomes. It is like trying to clutch water in ones hands. The harder we
grip, the more it slips through our fingers.”

Technology is destructive only in the hands of people who do not realize
that they are one and the same process as the universe.

In known history, nobody has had such capacity for altering the universe than the people of the United States of America.
And nobody has gone about it in such an aggressive way.

What I think we could aim for in the way of human civilization and culture would be a system
in which we are all highly aware of our existing interconnection and unity with the whole domain of nature,
and therefore do not have to go to all sorts of wild extremes to find that union.

A person who is fanatic in matters of religion,
and clings to certain ideas about the nature of God and the universe,
becomes a person who has no faith at all.

To have faith is to trust yourself to the water.
When you swim you don’t grab hold of the water, because if you do you will sink and drown.
Instead you relax, and float.

the attitude of faith is to let go, and become open to truth, whatever it might turn out to be.

Faith is a state of openness or trust.

And the attitude of faith is the very opposite of clinging to belief, of holding on.

The religious idea of God cannot do full duty for the metaphysical infinity.

the point is that God is what nobody admits to being, and everybody really is.

nothing – the negative, the empty – is exceedingly powerful.

Buddhism has in it no idea of there being a moral law laid down by some kind of cosmic lawgiver.

Religion is not a department of life; it is something that enters into the whole of it.

My metaphysics, let me be perfectly frank with you, are that there the central self,
you can call it God, you can call it anything you like, and it’s all of us.

Buddhism is not saying that the Self, the great Atman, or whatnot,
it isn’t denying that the experience which corresponds to these words is realizable.

Omnipotence is not knowing how everything is done; it’s just doing it.

If you awaken from this illusion, and you understand that black implies white, self implies other,
life implies death – or shall I say, death implies life – you can conceive yourself.

reality is only a Rorschach ink-blot, you know.

“The only Zen you’ll find on mountain tops is the Zen you bring up there with you.”

~ Krishna from The Bhagavad Gita:

It is better to strive in one’s own dharma than to succeed in the dharma of another.
Nothing is ever lost in following one’s own dharma. But competition in another’s dharma breeds fear and insecurity.

He alone sees truly who sees the Lord the same in every creature…seeing the same Lord everywhere,
he does not harm himself or others.

As long as you have attachment to the body and attachment to objects, fear and suffering will be with you.
Therefore, Krishna told Arjuna to develop his discrimination and rid himself of body consciousness.
He told him that once he was free of body consciousness he would be able to develop integral vision.

The awakened sages call a person wise when all his undertakings are free from anxiety about results.

Abandon all attachment to the results of action and attain supreme peace.

~ J.C. :
I tell you the truth, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers of mine, you did for me.

If we follow these principles, there is now to be found a short path available to technical mastery of mortality and mortal sufferings for earthlings, a reunification with our environs.

The principles have a simple base:

Do not confuse the map with reality – mind is a powerful map, but it is just a map.

Treat Others as though they were self, for we are all waves in one ocean.

Do not believe, see.

Do not hope, have faith in ourselves and The Allness.

ML

Cynthia McKinney Speaks on Return to U.S. After Being Held by Israel

2009-07-08 08:05:10

These are two separate interviews:

Democracy Now 7/8/2009

http://www.democracynow.org/2009/7/8/fmr_congressmember_cynthia_mckinney_back_in 

Amy Goodman interviews Cynthia and Adam Shapiro

WBAI in Exile 7/7/2009

http://www.livestream.com/wbaix?referrer=mogulus - 14:47

(click “ON-DEMAND” button, then select
“Cynthia McKinney Returns to the U.S. 07 Jul 2009″)

“”I can’t talk to the judge without first consulting my attorney”,
and she wrote me up for being rude” (to the tribunal)

“we thought they were trying to steer us into Israeli waters so
they would have an excuse for doing what they eventually did”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6d6UPOnxP5E – 2:44

For full transcript of Democracy Now interview read on:


(see also – 7/2/2009 – Nobel Peace Laureate Mairead Maguire Speaks from Israeli Jail Cell After Arrest on Boat Delivering Humanitarian Aid to Gaza
http://www.democracynow.org/2009/7/2/nobel_peace_laureate_mairead_maguire_speaks)

Guests:

Cynthia McKinney, former U.S. Congresswoman and the 2008 Green Party presidential candidate.

Adam Shapiro, documentary filmmaker, human rights activist and Palestinian rights activist. Adam was a co-founder of the ISM in Palestine. He was filming the voyage of the Arion for the Free Gaza Movement last week.

AMY GOODMAN: Former Congress member Cynthia McKinney arrived back in the United States Tuesday following her deportation from Israel. McKinney was one of 21 activists seized by the Israeli military in international waters last week as they tried to deliver humanitarian aid to Gaza. Also aboard the Free Gaza boat was Nobel Peace Prize laureate Mairead Maguire. Last week’s trip was the Free Gaza movement’s first since it aborted an attempt in January after the Israeli navy threatened to shoot the civilian passengers on board. That sailing had come just weeks after an Israeli Navy vessel deliberately rammed another of its boats, almost forcing it to sink. Cynthia McKinney joins us now in Washington D.C. We are joined here at the Firehouse by Adam Shapiro. He was filming the Free Gaza trip last week. He is a Palestinian human rights activist and co-founder of the International Solidarity Movement. Both former Congress member McKinney and Adam were detained for the past week and just deported back to the United States.

Cynthia McKinney why did you go? What happened to you in the Israeli jail?

CYNTHIA McKINNEY: I went because there’s a gross injustice being carried out everyday. This is my second attempt to get into Gaza with the Free Gaza organization. And for the two times I attempted to get in, two times I have been thwarted by the Israeli military. The cause is the human rights of the Palestinian people. The world saw the operation Cast Lead where the United States supplied white phosphorus, depleted uranium, cluster bombs, DIME weapons, were rained down on the defenseless people of Gaza. Of course, we desperately wanted to get in to take humanitarian relief supplies. And both times I have tried to go with Free Gaza, they’ve been thwarted—we have been supported thwarted by the Israeli military.

AMY GOODMAN: Now were you on one of the boats that was rammed?

CYNTHIA McKINNEY: I was on the Dignity. And yes it was rammed in international waters…

AMY GOODMAN: When was this?

CYNTHIA McKINNEY: ..This was in December, just a day or so after the outbreak of Operation Cast Lead. I was contacted by Free Gaza and asked to go within 24 hours and I said, yes, I would go.

AMY GOODMAN: I wanted to play a comment made last week by Israeli government spokesperson Mark Regev who dismissed the humanitarian mission of the Free Gaza Movement.

MARK REGEV: Israel every day is allowing humanitarian support to reach the people of Gaza. Food stuffs, medicines, energy and so forth. This boat was not about that. This boat was about political activists who have been apologists for the Hamas regime who have nothing whatsoever to say about Hamas’s brutal treatment of the people of Gaza.

AMY GOODMAN: Former Congress member McKinney, your response?

CYNTHIA McKINNEY: Well, clearly, we just had a visit to Gaza by President Carter, Former President Carter. Basically, he acknowledged that with the complete and utter devastation that the people of Gaza experienced at the hands of weapons that were supplied to Israel by the United States, he said that unfortunately the Palestinians are treated worse than human beings. I challenge the Israelis to respond to what President Carter had to say.

AMY GOODMAN: Former Congress member McKinney, tell us about the jail. Were you able to reach the Obama administration while you were there?

CYNTHIA McKINNEY: Well, the jail was very interesting. In fact, the first most interesting thing I witnessed was the seemingly endless stream of people of color who are being processed as we were being processed. And on my cell block, there were women from Africa and Asia who thought they were going to Israel because Israel was the Holy Land. And many of them, not all of them, but many of them had United Nations refugee status. They have been certified by UNHCR as refugees, but what they were told as they faced the threats and intimidation from the police is that the United Nations is not in Israel.

AMY GOODMAN: Adam Shapiro, you are Palestinian rights activist long known for this. You were on the boat. You were roughed up, you were filming when the Israeli military came on board. Describe what happened.

ADAM SHAPIRO: Well, they boarded us, four zodiac ships as well as eight naval warships, they surrounded our boat and can immediately towards the wheel house where I was along with the captain and one other crew member. I was documenting the whole trip and filming as they boarded the ship. Two soldiers came after me immediately, recognizing I think that they don’t want any footage of what was happening and they don’t want the world to know how they behave. I tried to keep the camera as long as I could. But I was pummeled repeatedly in the back and arms and choked and eventually they got the camera out of my hands. They have since taken all of our tapes, all of our flashcards and all of that, so we don’t have a record to show the world of what happened on board. The rest of the time we were detained in one room of the ship as we spent the better part of six hours navigating back to an Israeli port where we were processed and ultimately jailed.

AMY GOODMAN: There was another Al-Jazeera reporter on board as well ?

ADAM SHAPIRO: There was an Al-Jazeera reporter and cameramen. They lost all of their footage and camera as well.

AMY GOODMAN: Their computer was taken?

ADAM SHAPIRO: Yes, it was taken, completely reformatted and erased. And so again, we don’t seem to have a record to show the world what happened.

AMY GOODMAN: Your response to Israeli Spokesperson Regev?

ADAM SHAPIRO: Well Mark Regev is known for his colorful descriptions of how great life is in Gaza as far as Israel is concerned. However, all of the reporting, including the most recent International Committee for the Red Cross, shows the number of trucks Israel is allowing into Gaza is completely insufficient for what is needed. And so yes, it is true, he can say Israel allows foodstuffs and medicines to get in, but two trucks a day or 20 trucks a day is far inferior to what is needed. And we have seen, since the international outcry following January’s attack has subsided the number of trucks Israel has allowed in has decreased. And so, what we are saying, Free Gaza is a humanitarian effort to bring in the kinds of medicines and foods that are needed. But the Free Gaza movement is also a political organization in the sense we are human rights organization, And human rights for Palestinians is inherently political. And we are challenging Israel politically too, and this week I think has been a success for those of us who are fighting for Palestinian rights. We were not able to get into Gaza but we have shown the world the true colors of the Israeli occupation, and the double standard by which the United States and other countries are dealing with Israel.

AMY GOODMAN: Former Congress member McKinney, we only have ten seconds. But, you’ve just been deported. What are your plans right now?

CYNTHIA McKINNEY: Well, I would like to see the children of Gaza have the coloring books and crayons that we had on board with us. I would like to see the houses that have been destroyed rebuilt. I would like to see the lives rebuilt for the people of Gaza and I would like to see the people of Palestine have, and enjoy their human rights.

AMY GOODMAN: Do you think president Obama is headed in that direction?

CYNTHIA McKINNEY: I think you can probably answer that as well as we can, because while we were in detention, the Foreign Ministry of Ireland made protests and asked the government of Israel to release its nationals, several Members of Parliament

AMY GOODMAN: …We have 5 seconds….

CYNTHIA McKINNEY: from the United Kingdom…

AMY GOODMAN: … 5 seconds….

CYNTHIA McKINNEY: …also wanted to censure Israel. Nothing from the United States.

AMY GOODMAN: Cynthia McKinney, Adam Shapiro, Thank you so much. I’m Amy Goodman. Thanks for joining us.

The World According to Monsanto – 08 July 2009

http://wideeyecinema.com/?p=105 - 1:48:57

There is not much that is more wrong with the world than what you will learn about
from this video; i usually try to focus on the up side, on what is good,
all the things that can be done to make things right, on prescriptive info about what to do,
but it is vitally important you not let Monsanto do to you and yours.

It is vitally important to know what we must stop, especially the wholesale poisoning of us,
our food, and the Earth .

http://wideeyecinema.com/?p=105 

Honduras 2009 6/29

A Few Thoughts on the Coup in Honduras – Jeremy Scahill Junne 29, 2009 “Rebel Reports” –

There is a lot of great analysis circulating on the military coup against Manuel Zelaya in Honduras.
I do not see a need to re-invent the wheel. (See here here here and here). However, a few key things
jump out at me. First, we know that the coup was led by Gen. Romeo Vasquez, a graduate of the
US Army School of the Americas. As we know very well from history, these “graduates” maintain ties to
the US military as they climb the military career ladders in their respective countries.
That is a major reason why the US trains these individuals.

Secondly, the US has a fairly significant military presence in Honduras.
Joint Task Force-Bravo is located at Soto Cano Air Base, Honduras.
The base is home to some 550 US military personnel and more than 650 US and Honduran civilians:

They work in six different areas including the Joint Staff, Air Force Forces (612th Air Base Squadron),
Army Forces, Joint Security Forces and the Medical Element. 1st Battalion, 228th Aviation Regiment,
a US Army South asset, is a tenant unit also based at Soto Cano.
The J-Staff provides command and control for JTF-B.
The New York Times reports that “The unit focuses on training Honduran military forces, counternarcotics
operations, search and rescue, and disaster relief missions throughout Central America.”

Significantly, according to GlobalSecurity, “Soto Cano is a Honduran military installation and home of the Honduran Air Force.”


 

This connection to the Air Force is particularly significant given this report in NarcoNews:

The head of the Air Force, Gen. Luis Javier Prince Suazo, studied in the School of the Americas in 1996.
The Air Force has been a central protagonist in the Honduran crisis.
When the military refused to distribute the ballot boxes for the opinion poll, the ballot boxes were stored
on an Air Force base until citizens accompanied by Zelaya rescued them.
Zelaya reports that after soldiers kidnapped him, they took him to an Air Force base,
where he was put on a plane and sent to Costa Rica.
It is impossible to imagine that the US was not aware that the coup was in the works.
In fact, this was basically confirmed by The New York Times in Monday’s paper:

As the crisis escalated, American officials began in the last few days to talk with Honduran government
and military officials in an effort to head off a possible coup. A senior administration official,
who briefed reporters on the condition of anonymity, said the military broke off those discussions on Sunday.
While the US has issued heavily-qualified statements critical of the coup
—in the aftermath of the events in Honduras—the US could have flexed its tremendous economic muscle
before the coup and told the military coup plotters to stand down.
The US ties to the Honduran military and political establishment run far too deep for all of this to have gone
down without at least tacit support or the turning of a blind eye by some US political or military official(s).

Here are some facts to consider: the US is the top trading partner for Honduras.
The coup plotters/supporters in the Honduran Congress are supporters of the “free trade agreements”
Washington has imposed on the region.
The coup leaders view their actions, in part, as a rejection of Hugo Chavez’s influence in Honduras and with
Zelaya and an embrace of the United States and Washington’s “vision” for the region. Obama and the
US military could likely have halted this coup with a simple series of phone calls.
For an interesting take on all of this, make sure to check out Nikolas Kozloff’s piece on Counterpunch, where he writes:

In November, Zelaya hailed Obama’s election in the U.S. as “a hope for the world,” but just two months
later tensions began to emerge.  In an audacious letter sent personally to Obama, Zelaya accused the
U.S. of “interventionism” and called on the new administration in Washington to respect the principle
of non-interference in the political affairs of other nations.
Here are some independent news sources on this story:
School of the Americas Watch
NarcoNews
Eva Golinger’s Postcards from the Revolution

© 2009 Jeremy Scahill
Comments (41)

http://informationclearinghouse.info/article22944.htm

At least two leaders of the coup launched in Honduras today were apparently trained
at a controversial Department of Defense school based at Fort Benning, Georgia
infamous for producing graduates linked to torture,
death squads and other human rights abuses.
http://www.southernstudies.org/2009/06/key-leaders-of-honduras-military-coup-trained-in-us.html

Military Coup in Honduras  www.SOAW.org

From CISPES: Here are statements by other members of the Organization of American States:

(http://americasmexico.blogspot.com/2009/06/oas-countries-back-zelaya-calls-for.html).

Honduras Coup not News???
http://www.opednews.com/populum/diarypage.php?did=13629

New Honduran leader sworn in
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8123513.stm

Honduras names new leader after president ousted in military coup
http://news.scotsman.com/latestnews/Honduras-names-new-leader-after.5408957.jp

Honduran president overthrown, new leader voted in
http://news.theage.com.au/breaking-news-world/honduran-president-overthrown-new-leader-voted-in-20090629-d1fb.html

Honduras Supreme Court says it ordered presidents’ ouster
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2009-06/29/content_11616407.htm

Exiled Zelaya insists he is rightful Honduran president

http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-world/exiled-zelaya-insists-he-is-rightful-honduran-president-20090629-d1en.html

Protests erupt after coup in Honduras
http://tvnz.co.nz/world-news/protests-erupt-after-coup-in-honduras-2810235

Honduran President Is Ousted in Coup
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/29/world/americas/29honduras.html

Honduras Zelaya calls for peaceful resistance to coup
http://theusdaily.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=786669&type=home

Costa Rica calls on int’l community to condemn Honduras coup
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2009-06/29/content_11616377.htm

Ecuador says not to recognize any new Honduras govt
http://www.forexyard.com/en/reuters_inner.tpl?action=2009-06-28T173730Z_01_N28339621_RTRIDST_0_HONDURAS-PRESIDENT-ECUADOR-URGENT

US seeks return to power of deposed Honduran leader, and safety of his family meantime
http://www.canadaeast.com/news/article/712696

Ecuador, Venezuela condemn Honduras coup
http://english.cctv.com/20090629/101301.shtml

President.Zelaya.in.Costa.Rica
http://www.publicbroadcasting.net/wbfo/news.newsmain/article/0/0/1523223/World/Honduras.President.Zelaya.in.Costa.Rica.report (Reuters)

June 28th:

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/6/28/747720/-%5BUpdate-14%5D-Military-Coup-Underway-Now-in-Honduras

Postcards from the Revolution http://www.chavezcode.com/ 

UN General Assembly To Meet On Honduras Unrest Monday-Spokesman
http://www.nasdaq.com/aspx/stock-market-news-story.aspx?storyid=200906281959dowjonesdjonline000374&title=un-general-assembly-to-meet-on-honduras-unrest-monday-spokesman

Cuba condemns Honduras coup as ‘criminal, brutal’
http://www.reuters.com/article/latestCrisis/idUSN28348369

Coup in Honduras?
Soldiers arrested leftist President Manuel Zelaya Sunday as he planned

to carry out a controversial referendum to extend presidential term limits,

despite a Supreme Court ruling that the vote would be illegal.
http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/0628/p06s07-woam.html

Should Honduras constitution be changed?
http://newsforums.bbc.co.uk/nol/thread.jspa?forumID=6660&edition=2&ttl=20090629021348

Lalin scores to help Honduras beat Panama 2-0
http://www.waaytv.com/Global/story.asp?S=10608899&nav=menu635_3

Troops oust Honduran president in feared coup
http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-world/troops-oust-honduran-president-in-feared-coup-20090628-d1cf.html

Honduras court says ordered army to oust Zelaya
http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/6/29/worldupdates/2009-06-28T230315Z_01_NOOTR_RTRMDNC_0_-406531-1&sec=Worldupdates

Honduran Leader Pushes Ahead With Divisive Vote
http://abcnews.go.com/International/WireStory?id=7948541&page=1

Zelaya vows to go ahead with controversial Honduras vote
http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-world/zelaya-vows-to-go-ahead-with-controversial-honduras-vote-20090628-d137.html

Honduran President Zelaya Ousted in Coup by Military (Update2)
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601086&sid=aRbH.AbdAgUA

Background on Military Coup in Honduras
http://www.dollarsandsense.org/blog/2009/06/background-on-military-coup-in-honduras.html

In pictures: Honduran president ousted
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_pictures/8123314.stm

Honduran military to pick interim president (Vid)
http://english.aljazeera.net/news/americas/2009/06/2009628141859453757.html

European Union condemns military coup in Honduras
http://www.gmanews.tv/story/166142/European-Union-condemns-military-coup-in-Honduras

Argentine President says military coup in Honduras is “a return to barbarism”
http://www.telam.com.ar/vernota.php?tipo=N&dis=1&sec=1&idPub=151669&id=299617&idnota=299617

ALBA representatives reaffirm support to Hondura`s Legitimate Government
http://mathaba.net/news/?x=620928
(the Bolivarian Alliance of the Peoples of Our America)

Obama concerned over expulsion of Honduran leader
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3738299,00.html

Clinton urges condemnation of Honduran action
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/28/AR2009062801032.html

Obama Calls for Order as Honduran Military Arrests President
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/06/28/obama-calls-order-military-arrests-honduran-president/

Arrest a coup, says Honduras leader
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/feedarticle/8581486

Honduran president calls arrest a ‘kidnapping’
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/28/AR2009062800792.html

Honduras President Zelaya in Costa Rica: report
http://www.publicbroadcasting.net/wamc/news.newsmain/article/0/0/1523223/World.News/Honduras.President.Zelaya.in.Costa.Rica.report

Honduran president forced to Costa Rica after coup (2nd Roundup)
http://www.monstersandcritics.com/news/americas/news/article_1486431.php/Honduran_president_forced_to_Costa_Rica_after_coup__2nd_Roundup__#ixzz0JkgrrKbf&D

Honduras: Military Coup a Blow to Democracy
http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/HRW/56d116d630d9216a9892fd8f2af18c35.htm

Honduras Zelaya calls for peaceful resistance to coup
http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/6/29/worldupdates/2009-06-28T215351Z_01_NOOTR_RTRMDNC_0_-406521-1&sec=Worldupdates

Honduras President Zelaya in Costa Rica – CNN
http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/6/28/worldupdates/2009-06-28T210221Z_01_NOOTR_RTRMDNC_0_-406513-1&sec=Worldupdates 

Court says Honduras to hold presidential vote in Nov. 29
http://www.worldbulletin.net/news_detail.php?id=44063

Venezuela Threatens Attack On Honduras
http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/World-News/Honduras-President-Manuel-Zelaya-Deposed-In-Coup-Venezuela-Threatens-Military-Attack/Article/200906415321924

Chavez: CIA Behind Coup in Honduras
http://www.lademajagua.co.cu/infgran11257.htm

UPDATE 2-Chavez threatens military action over Honduras coup
http://www.forexpros.com/news/commodities—futures-news/update-2-chavez-threatens-military-action-over-honduras-coup-66974

Venezuelan, Cuban, and Nicaraguan Ambassadors to Honduras Kidnapped
http://www.venezuelanalysis.com/news/4556

Venezuela says troops kidnap diplomats in Honduras
http://www.forexyard.com/en/reuters_inner.tpl?action=2009-06-28T165015Z_01_N28335731_RTRIDST_0_HONDURAS-PRESIDENT-AMBASSADORS-URGENT

Chavez puts Venezuela troops on alert on Honduras
http://in.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idINIndia-40653020090628

Israelis in Honduras warned to exercise caution amid unrest
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1096197.html

Is Honduras’ Military Junta The Hot New Revolution?
http://gawker.com/5303388/is-honduras-military-junta-the-hot-new-revolution

Honduras Tense After Army Coup – Wall Street Journal
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124619401378065339.html#mod=rss_Today%27s_Most_Popular

Honduras: Political Crisis Over Controversial Referendum
http://www.petroleumworld.com/sunopf09062801.htm

27th:

Zelaya continues push for controversial Honduras vote
http://news.theage.com.au/breaking-news-world/zelaya-continues-push-for-controversial-honduras-vote-20090627-d0fl.html

Chavez’s Hollow Pledge on Honduras
http://bellum.stanfordreview.org/?p=1413

26th:

Honduran President staves off coup attempt
http://www.fsrn.org/audio/headlines-friday-june-26-2009/4959

Much has been going on in Honduras this month leading up to this,
from a recent coup attempt (ablove), to an Earthquake, an OAS meeting,
and two important futball games.

7th
Win Over Honduras Keeps U.S. on Track – USA 2, Honduras 1
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/06/AR2009060602623.html?hpid=sec-sports

10th
Honduras edges El Salvador 1-0 in WCup qualifying
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/soccer/2009-06-10-2132962017_x.htm

2nd
Earthquake shakes Honduras before OAS meeting
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iwUoPU-nOb8Et42KKOKYUa8A43DwD98ILHVO1
http://www.fsrn.org/audio/headlines-friday-june-26-2009/4959

FACTBOX – Key facts about Honduras

http://www.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUSTRE55R17J20090628

Who’s at the Health Care Reform Table Besides Corp’s(es’) Lobbies?

Today a local Peace list I’m on, and the Green Party US National Committee Discussion List,
both synergized me on this kore important issue that shows lobbyists easily cajoling politicians
into severely dropping the people’s ball once again on this critically out of control issue.
Apparently 54% – 65% of us* (and 59% of physicians**), want single payer, or some such similar
plan, yet such a plan is not even on the table.
http://www.grahamazon.com/over/2008/01/poll-shows-majority-support-single-payer/
   http://news.yahoo.com/page/election-2008-political-pulse-voter-worries-highlights;_ylt=AkO9w4FTYhpdbrgapp1RIB9QzpB4
** http://www.reuters.com/article/latestCrisis/idUSN31432035
The lobbyists at the table are inclining bargaining towards even more of the worst exacerbations of
the excesses of the current system. Things like requiring us all to funnel our money through the
current (lack of a) system (of private insurers) designed to profit by taking our money to spend much
of it deciding to deny us care our doctors know we need.
An Opaque System
We do not need solutions that exacerbate the core human and financial issues. One isssue that is
largely being ignored by the focus on the interests of the insurance and drug industries is the huge
cost of admin for he current system. 31% of US health spending goes to admin*, much of that cost
is spent submitting paperwork to a plethora of providers so they can spend much of their overhead
deciding who to deny care to.
http://www.pnhp.org/single_payer_resources/administrative_waste_consumes_31_percent_of_health_spending.php
“Taxes already pay for more than 60 percent of US health spending. Americans pay the highest
health care taxes in the world. We pay for national health insurance, but don’t get it.”*
http://www.pnhp.org/single_payer_resources/60_percent_of_health_spending_is_already_publicly_financed_enough_to_cover_everyone.php
Because the right wing wants to focus on personal responsibility, they have allowed an atmosphere
that has fostered conditions conducive to the giants of finance, insurance, banking, credit, and loans
industries, allowing them to make huge profits from writing the laws their way. They say they do this
to allow more of a “free market” in what has become a tidal wave of personal misery bouying up
profits within the industry and depreseing wages across the board. Still medical bills contribute to
half of all personal bankruptcies*, and yet 3/4 of those recently bankrupted had coverage when their
health issues started them on the road to financial ruin.
http://www.reuters.com/article/latestCrisis/idUSN31432035
The biggest inefficiency of all is that our collective social and security needs require us to administer
emergency care to those without real care; those who would have fared much better with better
primary and preventitive care force the taxpayers and insurance consumers to subsidize the care of
the very poor very inefficiently. This is to say nothing of costs of the human misery of the pain,
disease, and crimes that transpire as a result.
There seems to be no end to the number of health care professionals and other activists they will
arrest to keep the phrase “single payer” out of the chambers of legislation*.
http://www.healthcare-now.org/real-news-network-single-payer-advocates-protest-senate-hearing-video/
   http://www.somdnews.com/stories/05082009/entetop163119_32200.shtml
   http://www.healthcare-now.org/five-more-single-payer-protesters-arrested/
   http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/05/12/1929527.aspx
   http://health.mashget.com/2009/05/12/five-single-payer-protestors-arrested/
If you look closely at the process writing this legislation, you will see much happening that
underscores the degree to which justice is not being done to one of the the two main desires or
hopes that were so boldy expressed last Nov. I will address war another time, here we focus on the
positive side, what we do want and need? health care that makes sense!!!
Still we see a legislative process that is willing to waste immense amounts of wealth and human
capital through the process of essentially expanding human misery to create a market that favors
larger profits for inhuman corps.
Bill Moyers explores “Who is at the Table?
Bill takes note of how many times we’ve already bought this bill of goods,
“don’t worry we’ll cut costs voluntarilly, sure. Now health care cots are rising 6% a year.
Anyone with a memory could be excused for raising their eyebrows at these latest promises”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wi1acHg3mhw (June 04, 2009)
with additional links and comments:
http://anycarinsurance.com/2009/06/bill-moyers-journal-single-payer-health-insurance-pbs/

Who Will Be at the Table Archive
Trudy Lieberman is up to 9 articles in her series so far:
http://www.cjr.org/campaign_desk/who_will_be_at_the_table_archi.php
Compare the Three Major Offerings on the Table With the Kaiser Foundation‘s Help.
http://www.kff.org/healthreform/sidebyside.cfm
Rhonda has a perspective that most of us need to learn from.
This was the most informative article i read today, and that’s really saying something!
Debunking Canadian health care myths
By Rhonda Hackett; POSTED: 06/07/2009 01:00:00 AM MDT
http://www.denverpost.com/opinion/ci_12523427
What do we pay for, anyway?
As a Canadian living in the United States for the past 17 years, I am frequently asked by Americans
and Canadians alike to declare one health care system as the better one.
Often I’ll avoid answering, regardless of the questioner’s nationality. To choose one or the other
system usually translates into a heated discussion of each one’s merits, pitfalls, and an intense
recitation of commonly cited statistical comparisons of the two systems.
Because if the only way we compared the two systems was with statistics, there is a clear victor.
It is becoming increasingly more difficult to dispute the fact that Canada spends less money on
health care to get better outcomes.
Yet, the debate rages on. Indeed, it has reached a fever pitch since President Barack Obama took
office, with Americans either dreading or hoping for the dawn of a single-payer health care system.
Opponents of such a system cite Canada as the best example of what not to do, while proponents
laud that very same Canadian system as the answer to all of America’s health care problems.
Frankly, both sides often get things wrong when trotting out Canada to further their respective
arguments.
As America comes to grips with the reality that changes are desperately needed within its health
care infrastructure, it might prove useful to first debunk some myths about the Canadian system.
Myth: Taxes in Canada are extremely high, mostly because of national health care.
In actuality, taxes are nearly equal on both sides of the border. Overall, Canada’s taxes are slightly
higher than those in the U.S. However, Canadians are afforded many benefits for their tax dollars,
even beyond health care (e.g., tax credits, family allowance, cheaper higher education), so the end
result is a wash. At the end of the day, the average after-tax income of Canadian workers is equal to
about 82 percent of their gross pay. In the U.S., that average is 81.9 percent.
Myth: Canada’s health care system is a cumbersome bureaucracy.
The U.S. has the most bureaucratic health care system in the world. More than 31 percent of every
dollar spent on health care in the U.S. goes to paperwork, overhead, CEO salaries, profits, etc.
The provincial single-payer system in Canada operates with just a 1 percent overhead.
Think about it. It is not necessary to spend a huge amount of money to decide who gets
care and who doesn’t when everybody is covered.
Myth: The Canadian system is significantly more expensive than that of the U.S.Ten percent of
Canada’s GDP is spent on health care for 100 percent of the population. The U.S. spends 17 percent
of its GDP but 15 percent of its population has no coverage whatsoever and millions of others have
inadequate coverage. In essence, the U.S. system is considerably more expensive than Canada’s.
Part of the reason for this is uninsured and underinsured people in the U.S. still get sick and
eventually seek care. People who cannot afford care wait until advanced stages of an illness to see
a doctor and then do so through emergency rooms, which cost considerably more than primary care
services.
What the American taxpayer may not realize is that such care costs about $45 billion per year,
and someone has to pay it. This is why insurance premiums increase every year for insured patients
while co-pays and deductibles also rise rapidly.
Myth: Canada’s government decides who gets health care and when they get it.While HMOs and
other private medical insurers in the U.S. do indeed make such decisions, the only people in Canada
to do so are physicians. In Canada, the government has absolutely no say in who gets care or how
they get it. Medical decisions are left entirely up to doctors, as they should be.
There are no requirements for pre-authorization whatsoever. If your family doctor says you need an
MRI, you get one. In the U.S., if an insurance administrator says you are not getting an MRI,
you don’t get one no matter what your doctor thinks — unless, of course, you have the money to
cover the cost.
Myth: There are long waits for care, which compromise access to care.There are no waits for urgent
or primary care in Canada. There are reasonable waits for most specialists’ care, and much longer
waits for elective surgery. Yes, there are those instances where a patient can wait up to a month for
radiation therapy for breast cancer or prostate cancer, for example. However, the wait has nothing to
do with money per se, but everything to do with the lack of radiation therapists. Despite such waits,
however, it is noteworthy that Canada boasts lower incident and mortality rates than the U.S. for all
cancers combined, according to the U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group and the Canadian Cancer
Society. Moreover, fewer Canadians (11.3 percent) than Americans (14.4 percent) admit unmet health
care needs.
Myth: Canadians are paying out of pocket to come to the U.S. for medical care.Most patients who
come from Canada to the U.S. for health care are those whose costs are covered by the Canadian
governments. If a Canadian goes outside of the country to get services that are deemed medically
necessary, not experimental, and are not available at home for whatever reason (e.g., shortage or
absence of high tech medical equipment; a longer wait for service than is medically prudent; or lack
of physician expertise), the provincial government where you live fully funds your care. Those
patients who do come to the U.S. for care and pay out of pocket are those who perceive their care to
be more urgent than it likely is.
Myth: Canada is a socialized health care system in which the government runs hospitals and where
doctors work for the government.Princeton University health economist Uwe Reinhardt says single-
payer systems are not “socialized medicine” but “social insurance” systems because doctors work in
the private sector while their pay comes from a public source. Most physicians in Canada are self-
employed. They are not employees of the government nor are they accountable to the government.
Doctors are accountable to their patients only. More than 90 percent of physicians in Canada are paid
on a fee-for-service basis. Claims are submitted to a single provincial health care plan for
reimbursement, whereas in the U.S., claims are submitted to a multitude of insurance providers.
Moreover, Canadian hospitals are controlled by private boards and/or regional health authorities
rather than being part of or run by the government.
Myth: There aren’t enough doctors in Canada.
From a purely statistical standpoint, there are enough physicians in Canada to meet the health care
needs of its people. But most doctors practice in large urban areas, leaving rural areas with bona
fide shortages. This situation is no different than that being experienced in the U.S. Simply training
and employing more doctors is not likely to have any significant impact on this specific problem.
Whatever issues there are with having an adequate number of doctors in any one geographical area,
they have nothing to do with the single-payer system.
And these are just some of the myths about the Canadian health care system. While emulating the
Canadian system will likely not fix U.S. health care, it probably isn’t the big bad “socialist” bogeyman
it has been made out to be.
It is not a perfect system, but it has its merits. For people like my 55-year-old Aunt Betty, who has
been waiting for 14 months for knee-replacement surgery due to a long history of arthritis, it is the
superior system. Her $35,000-plus surgery is finally scheduled for next month. She has been in pain,
and her quality of life has been compromised. However, there is a light at the end of the tunnel.
Aunt Betty — who lives on a fixed income and could never afford private health insurance, much less
the cost of the surgery and requisite follow-up care — will soon sport a new, high-tech knee. Waiting
14 months for the procedure is easy when the alternative is living in pain for the rest of your life.
Rhonda Hackett of Castle Rock is a clinical psychologist.
© 2009 The Denver Post
The other side, USians familiar with the Canadian system:
Americans Who’ve Used Canada’s Health-Care System Respond to Current Big-Lie Media Campaign
June 13,2009 – Bill Mann
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bill-mann/americans-whove-used-cana_b_215256.html

Not long ago, the CBC asked Canadians to nominate and then vote for The Greatest Canadian in history.

Thousands responded.

The winner? Not Wayne Gretzky, as I expected (although the hockey great DID make the Top 10).

Not even Alexander Graham Bell, another finalist.

The greatest Canadian ever?

Tommy Douglas.

Who? Tommy Douglas was a Canadian politician – and the father of Canadian universal health care.

 

The Healthcare War is Now Official
ROBERT REICH; THURSDAY, JUNE 11, 2009
http://robertreich.blogspot.com/
Yesterday the American Medical Association came out against a public option for health care. And
yesterday the President reaffirmed his support for it. The next weeks will show what Obama is made
of — whether he’s willing and able to take on the most formidable lobbying coalition he has faced so
far on an issue that will define his presidency.
And make no mistake: A public option large enough to have bargaining leverage to drive down drug
prices and private-insurance premiums is the defining issue of universal health care. It’s the only
way to make health care affordable. It’s the only way to prevent Medicare and Medicaid from eating
up future federal budgets. An ersatz public option — whether Kent Conrad’s non-profit cooperatives,
Olympia Snowe’s “trigger,” or regulated state-run plans — won’t do squat.
The last president to successfully take on the giant health care lobbies was LBJ. He got Medicare and
Medicaid enacted because he weighed into the details, twisted congressional arms, threatened and
cajoled, drew lines in the sand, and went to war against the AMA and the other giant lobbyists
standing in the way. The question now is how much LBJ is in Barack Obama.
The big guns are out and they’re firing. All major lobbying firms in Washington — many of them
brimming with ex-members of Congress — are now crawling all over the Hill. Lots of money is on the
table. AMA’s political action committee has contributed $9.8 million to congressional candidates
since 2000, and its lobbying arm is one of the most formidable on the Hill. Meanwhile, Big Insurance
and Big Pharma are increasing their firepower. The five largest private insurers and their trade group
America’s Health Insurance Plans spent a total of $6.4 million on lobbying in the first quarter of this
year, up more than $1 million from the first quarter last year, and are spending even more now.
United Health Group spent $1.5 million in the first quarter, up 34 percent from the $1.1 million it
spent in the first quarter last year. Aetna spent $809,793 between January and the end of March,
up 41 percent from last year. Pfizer, the world’s biggest drugmaker, spent more than $6.1 million on
lobbying between January and March, more than double what it spent last year. It also spent nearly
$3.3 million lobbying in the fourth quarter of 2008. Every one of them is upping their spending.
Some congressional Democrats are willing and able to stand up to this barrage. Many are not.
They need cover from the White House.
The President can’t do this alone. You must weigh in and get everyone you know to weigh in, too.
Bombard your senators and representatives. Organize and mobilize others. And let the White House
know how strongly you feel. This is one of those battles that define a presidency. But more
importantly, it’s one of those battles that define the state of American democracy.
Reich followed this with an appearance on Bill Moyers Journal Friday evening. June 12, 2009.
Bill asks, “Will he (Obama) push back?”
http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/06122009/profile.html
I quote only a short bit with my highlighting a few key pints.
*BILL MOYERS: *Wait a minute. The folks who are fighting for single-payer out there say it is
feasible if only Congress would look at the economics of it.
*ROBERT REICH: *Well, a lot of things are feasible if Congress looks at the economics of them.
But politically, no, unfortunately and I’m a big single-payer fan. Unfortunately, *we cannot get there
from here because the political forces are just too strong against single-payer.*
*BILL MOYERS: *Are the business forces prescient when they say that if we get a public option, it
opens the door down the road to single-payer?
*ROBERT REICH: *If the government simply requires that the public option pay for itself, can be not-
for-profit, just pays for itself that’s not going to be necessarily a direct opening to single-payer.
But it is going to force the private insurers and the drug companies and the medical suppliers to be
honest, to control costs, and to provide better quality.
*BILL MOYERS: *You’ve got these powerful lobbies that you’ve been writing about on your blog.
And you said on your blog this week that the real question for you is the extent to which Barack
Obama will push back against these lobbies. What’s your answer to your own question?
*ROBERT REICH: *I don’t know, Bill. This is the first test where there is huge organized opposition.
And it’s coming from very, very powerful lobbies who have prevailed– not just for ten or 15 years.
You’ve prevailed for decades on this issue. So this is the truth time in terms of how able and willing
the President and the White House is to really set boundaries and push members of Congress.
*So it’s at this point– and I’m talking about the next two or three or four weeks. I mean, we’re
talking about crunch time right now– that the President has got to step in and be forceful and be
specific. And I don’t know whether he will be. I hope he is.*
Bill Moyer’s Profile of Reich
http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/06122009/profile.html
Single-Payer: Is Nationalized Health Coverage the Way to Go?
Bill Moyers; 2009 05
http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/blog/2009/05/singlepayer_is_nationalized_he.html
Health Reform for Beginners: The Difference Between Socialized Medicine, Single-Payer Health
Care, and What We’ll Be Getting Ezra Klien
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2009/06/health_reform_for_beginners_th_1.html
Do You Think Socialized Medicine Would Be:
Better – 45%
Worse – 39%
About the Same – 4%
Who Knows – 12%
I’ve been meaning to write this post for some time. The words “socialized medicine” and”single-
payer health care” get thrown around with such gleeful abandon that they’ve both become a bit
unmoored from their actual meanings. In the American health-care debate, they tend to refer to
“whatever the Democrats are proposing.” But that’s not what they mean.
Socialized medicine is a system in which the government owns the means of providing medicine.
Britain is an example of socialized system, as, in America, is the Veterans Health Administration.
In a socialized system, the government employs the doctors and nurses, builds and owns the
hospitals, and bargains for and purchases the technology. I have literally never heard a proposal
for converting America to a socialized system of medicine. And I know a lot of liberals.
Single-payer health care is not socialized medicine. It’s a system in which one institution purchases
all, or in reality, most, of the care. But the payer does not own the doctors or the hospitals or the
nurses or the MRI scanners. Medicare is an example of a mostly single-payer system, as is France.
Both of these systems have private insurers to choose from, but the government is the dominant
purchaser. (As an aside here, unlike in socialized medicine, “single-payer health care” has nothing in
particular to do with the government. The state might be the single payer. But if Aetna managed to
wrest 100 percent of the health insurance market, then it would be the single payer.
The term refers to market share, not federal control.)
Socialized medicine is far outside any discussion we’re having. Single-payer medicine has a genuine
constituency but is also a vanishingly unlikely outcome. But the promiscuous use of the terms has
created a rather confused population. “Socialized medicine” is the thing we don’t have. In some case,
it’s the thing we don’t like. The graph atop this post comes from a poll conducted by the Harvard
School of Public Health. They found that Americans actually preferred socialized medicine to our
system. Or take this question, about our current system:
Is The Following “Socialized Medicine?”:
HMOs – 31%
Veteran’s Health – 47%
Medicare – 60
(numbers rounded off)
You’re reading that right. About 30 percent of Americans think HMOs are socialized medicine.
Which implies a couple things. First, the term “socialized medicine” has been diluted beyond all
meaning. Second, it’s no longer considered a terrifying outcome. And third, nothing that’s this
amorphous — and actually preferred by a plurality of the population — is likely to prove a terribly
effective attack against health reform. Socialized medicine has become such a stand-in for “not this
system of medicine” that it’s begun to look good in comparison.
Meanwhile, what we’re actually going to get is not socialized medicine or single-payer health care.
It’s a hybrid system. Private insurers, hopefully competing with a public option. Private doctors and
private hospitals. Government regulation and subsidies. It’s going to be complicated and messy and
inefficient and hopeful and the product of a strange mix of corporate preferences and public
compassion and latent populism. It will, in other words, be a uniquely American system, and hard to
describe with a single epithet.
Obama and the Lobbyist
Frank Blair
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/milwaukeepeace/message/2396
I have gone on record numerous times in the past as saying that none of us…as voters…has as
much to say about how the government is run as do the lobbying groups in Washington.  They run
a massive industry on K Street in the nation’s capital.  True, there are “good” lobbyists as well as
those who would oppose legislation which would seem as being advantageous to the people at large
but for the most part it is the lobbyists with the most money….millions of dollars….who grease the
outstretched palms of our elected politicians.
Such an advantage is now being debated everwhere.  I am talking about the reformed health care
plan under which a large segment of the population in the US which is uninsured would have
available a government proposal guaranteeing that they would have a plan insuring them of
adequate coverage.
Robert Reich, former Secretary of Labor in Bill Clinton’s cabinet, raises a critical question on this
morning’s AlterNet.  Reich has always been a sane voice in what has often been a babble of talk.
 And he raises the question of whether President Obama has the fortitude (one might say “guts”) to
confront the lobbyists as they seek to prevent a health care plan forthcoming.   In particular he cites
Big Insurance, Big Pharma but most of all (and this may surprise many),  the American Medical
Association, as opposing health reform.  Millions of dollars are waiting to be thrown into the battle.
The question remains whether Obama has anything beyond a smooth oratorical talent to oppose
these lobbyists.  Reich has this to say about Medicare and Medicaid which came into being under the
tutelage of LBJ in the 1960s:
             “The last president to succesfully take on the giant
              health care lobbies was LBJ. He got Medicare and
              Medicaid enacted because he weighed into the details,
              twisted congressional arms, threatened and cajoled,
              drew lines in the sand and went to war against the AMA
              and the other giant lobbyists standing in the way.  The
              question now is how much LBJ is in Barack Obama.”
This indeed is the question.  Lobby groups are powerful entities and throw their weight around in
ways that are hard to resist especially when they contribute to the political funds of those who
legislate!
Will Obama be up to the task?   That is the million dollar question.
Email Comment
Scott McLarty, GPUS Media Coordinator; Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 5:34 PM
Greens “need to take stock of reality and get out the message that Single-Payer will only be possible
when the political landscape changes.
The only hope of changing the political landscape in a way that will lead to Single-Payer’s enactment
(and a lot of other real & systematic changes) is the emergence of a strong alternative party that
doesn’t take money & orders from corporate lobbies.” (Green Parties don’t)
Physicians for a National Health Program
is an excellent source of mind blowing info about health care reform:
http://www.pnhp.org/
http://www.pnhp.org/single_payer_resources/pnhp_research_the_case_for_a_national_health_program.php
The Green Party US on Health Care Reform in 2009:

President Obama can either work to enact health care for all Americans or he can support insurance and HMO industry profits, say Greens,
January 29, 2009 - http://gp.org/press/pr-national.php?ID=174
Greens urge widespread protest over President Obama’s exclusion of Single-Payer/Medicare For All advocates from the March 5 health care reform summit at the White House Wednesday,
March 4, 2009 - http://gp.org/press/pr-national.php?ID=188

America needs Single-Payer, not the public health care option, say Greens Tuesday
May 26, 2009 - http://gp.org/press/pr-national.php?ID=216
Greens prepare for the national Day of Action promoting Single-Payer national health care on May 30,
May 28, 2009 - http://gp.org/press/pr-national.php?ID=218
Green Party leaders challenge Sen. Baucus and defenders of private insurance to debate Single-Payer advocates, 
June 4, 2009- http://gp.org/press/pr-national.php?ID=221

Tell Congress No! Retain the right to grow food!

This Bill Died In Committee.

soon to be up for a vote is a bill that could stop small and local producers;
HR-875  ‘Food Safety Modernization Act of 2009’
There is a U.S House Resolution…HR875…entitled “The Food Safety Modernization Act”…put forth by Rosa Deloro, a Dem. from CT, whose husband is Stanley Greenberg, who works with many corporations, including Monsanto, that wants EVERYONE who grows ANY food to register and report to the Feds.
Failure to do so results in large fines and potential seizure of property.
I’ve never been poisoned by anything at a farmers market, and it’s none of their business if i choose to grow a strawberry plant or a tomato!
Text of Bills:
HR-875
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-875
S-425
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d111:s425:
HR-875 Meta Data:
http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h875/show
YouTubes:
1:40; INN report; Criminalize Organic Farming? EXCUSE ME?! BILLS: HR 875 and S 425
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epXNJNjYBvw
5:22 (actually @ 2:25-4:20); Don’t Panic! USGovernment to regulate ANY “Farm” – Victory Gardens? RELOAD
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6cTzT8qRIS4&feature=related
8:15; The End of Local Food (HR 875)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GkaNR-bqlrY
google video search:
http://video.google.com/videosearch?hl=en&client=safari&rls=en&ei=lYjCSYahHKCltgeIv4zgCg&resnum=0&q=HR+875&um=1&ie=UTF-8&ei=rIjCSbrdM5_htgepkqXhCg&sa=X&oi=video_result_group&resnum=4&ct=title#
Text Editorials:
Monsanto’s dream bill, HR 875 (followed by an excellent selection of Monsanto GM quotes, and massive good commentary)
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Monsanto-s-dream-bill-HR-by-Linn-Cohen-Cole-090309-337.html
&
http://vegancowprotect.wordpress.com/2009/03/10/monsantos-dream-bill-hr-875/#comment-317
Change We Can Believe In: How About the End of Farmers Markets? Say Hello to H.R. 875: Food Safety Modernization Act of 2009
http://cryptogon.com/?p=7362
HR 875 The food police, criminalizing organic farming and the backyard gardener, and violation of the 10th amendment
http://www.campaignforliberty.com/blog.php?view=12671
HR 875: The End Of Organic Farming?
http://thefinalhour.blogspot.com/2009/03/hr-875-end-of-organic-farming.html
HR875: Your homegrown tomatoes are illegal
http://open.salon.com/blog/gordon_wagner/2009/03/17/hr875_your_homegrown_tomatoes_are_illegal
The End of Organic Farming? How HR875 Could Kill the Farmers Market
http://ezinearticles.com/?The-End-of-Organic-Farming?-How-HR875-Could-Kill-the-Farmers-Market&id=2088965
Social Bookmarks:
http://digg.com/search?section=all&s=Food+Safety+Modernization+Act+of+2009
http://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/84r5m/hr875_which_would_give_more_power_to_monsanto_was/
feel free to plagiarize my wiseacre comment below left on one of these pages;
better yet, write your congress person!
i’m so scared of organic food that i think the government should arm us with assault weapons and rockets and train us to use such in self defense against rabid tomatoes and broccoli
it would probably also make us a whole lot safer if we spread all our nuclear waste evenly over all lands that might be used to grow food consumed in the US just to make sure that even if organic farming techniques are being used anywhere that i won’t have to be attacked by any actually organic food
as to those who would like to give me their extra homegrown zucchinis, i would be happy to entertain the idea of accepting them if you can submit triplicate copies of the paperwork required by this bill to ensure your food facility is safe enough for me and mine

growing vegetables next door without submission of this documentation will require a response from my assault weapons

monte letourneau WI Green Party
Allness Unlimited
http://network.greenchange.org/people/monte
all general statements are false